High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:9
|
作者
He, Yuewen [1 ]
Liu, Na [2 ]
Zhuang, Xuhui [1 ]
Wang, Xia [1 ]
Ma, Wuhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 12 Jichang Rd, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Weihai Municipal Affiliated Hosp, Weihai, Peoples R China
关键词
coronavirus disease 2019; high-flow nasal cannula; noninvasive ventilation; ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE; OXYGEN-THERAPY; MORTALITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/17534666221087847
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raging around the world, the effectiveness of respiratory support treatment has dominated people's field of vision. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and value of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for COVID-19 patients. Methods: A comprehensive systematic review via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, WHO database, China Biology Medicine Disc (SINOMED), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases was conducted, followed by meta-analysis. RevMan 5.4 was used to analyze the results and risk of bias. The primary outcome is the number of deaths at day 28. The secondary outcomes are the occurrence of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), the number of deaths (no time-limited), length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, ventilator-free days, and oxygenation index [partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO(2))] at 24 h. Results: In total, nine studies [one randomized controlled trial (RCT), seven retrospective studies, and one prospective study] totaling 1582 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the incidence of IMV, number of deaths (no time-limited), and length of ICU stay were not statistically significant in the HFNC group compared with the NIV group (ps = 0.71, 0.31, and 0.33, respectively). Whereas the HFNC group performed significant advantages in terms of the number of deaths at day 28, length of hospital stay and oxygenation index (p < 0.05). Only in the ventilator-free days did NIV show advantages over the HFNC group (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: For COVID-19 patients, the use of HFNC therapy is associated with the reduction of the number of deaths at day 28 and length of hospital stay, and can significantly improve oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO(2)) at 24 h. However, there was no favorable between the HFNC and NIV groups in the occurrence of IMV. NIV group was superior only in terms of ventilator-free days.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Yuewen
    Liu, Na
    Zhuang, Xuhui
    Wang, Xia
    Ma, Wuhua
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2022, 16
  • [2] Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Yun
    Dai, Bing
    Zhao, Hong-wen
    Wang, Wei
    Kang, Jian
    Hou, Hai-jia
    Tan, Wei
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2022, 16
  • [3] Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Yun
    Dai, Bing
    Zhao, Hong-wen
    Wang, Wei
    Kang, Jian
    Hou, Hai-jia
    Tan, Wei
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2022, 16
  • [4] High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19
    Beran, Azizullah
    Srour, Omar
    Malhas, Saif-Eddin
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Ayesh, Hazem
    Sajdeya, Omar
    Musallam, Rami
    Khokher, Waleed
    Kalifa, Muhamad
    Srour, Khaled
    Assaly, Ragheb
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2022, 67 (09) : 1177 - 1189
  • [5] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beran, A.
    Srour, O.
    Malhas, S.
    Mhanna, M.
    Ayesh, H.
    Khokher, W.
    Srour, K.
    Assaly, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [6] Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Glenardi
    Chriestya, Febie
    Oetoro, Bambang J.
    Mangkuliguna, Ghea
    Natalia, Natalia
    [J]. ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 37 (01) : 71 - 83
  • [7] VARIATION IN USE OF HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA AND NONINVASIVE VENTILATION IN COVID-19
    Garcia, Michael
    Johnson, Shelsey
    Sisson, Emily
    Sheldrick, Christopher
    Kumar, Vishakha
    Boman, Karen
    Bolesta, Scott
    Bansal, Vikas
    Bogojevic, Marija
    Garces, Juan Pablo Domecq
    Lal, Amos
    Heavner, Smith
    Cheruku, Sreekanth
    Armaignac, Donna
    Anderson, Harry
    Denson, Joshua
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Kashyap, Rahul
    Walkey, Allan
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 75 - 75
  • [8] High-flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Ventilation in Laryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chan, Kai Chun
    Yang, Timothy Xianyi
    Khu, Kin Fai
    Ching, Vincent So
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [9] Variation in Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation Among Patients With COVID-19
    Garcia, Michael A.
    Johnson, Shelsey W.
    Sisson, Emily K.
    Sheldrick, Christopher R.
    Kumar, Vishakha K.
    Boman, Karen
    Bolesta, Scott
    Bansal, Vikas
    Bogojevic, Marija
    Domecq, J. P.
    Lal, Amos
    Heavner, Smith
    Cheruku, Sreekanth R.
    Lee, Donna
    Anderson, Harry L.
    Denson, Joshua L.
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Kashyap, Rahul
    Walkey, Allan J.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2022, 67 (08) : 929 - 938
  • [10] THE ROLE OF NONINVASIVE VENTILATION AND HIGH-FLOW NASAL CANNULA IN CRITICAL COVID-19 PNEUMONIA
    Perez-Gutierrez, Victor
    Ocrospoma, Sebastian
    Bhaskaran, Aditya
    Menon, Vidya
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 92 - 92