Reliability and validity study for the adaptation of the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule and the Self-Rated Version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule to Turkish for Individuals with Severe Mental Dis

被引:1
|
作者
Tuncer, Gulsum Zekiye [1 ]
Duman, Zekiye Cetinkaya [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu, Psikiyatri Hemsireligi Bolumu, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Hemsirelik Fak, Psikiyatri Hemsireligi Anabilim Dali, Izmir, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING | 2019年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CANSAS; CARE; ILLNESS; PEOPLE; OUTPATIENTS; INSTRUMENT; DIMENSIONS; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.14744/phd.2019.50490
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objectives: The study aimed to adapt the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule/Self-Rated version (CANSAS/CANSAS-P) to Turkish, and to test its validity and reliability on individuals with severe mental disorder. Methods: The sample consisted of 111 individuals with severe mental disorders who were receiving care at five separate Community Mental Health Centers in Izmir. The CANSAS was applied by the Researcher and an Observer to evaluate the participants, while the CANSAS-P was completed by the participants. Results: The content validity index of CANSAS and CANSAS-P was found to be 0.84. Results from the exploratory factor analysis showed that the compliance values of the CANSAS and CANSAS-P were 0.68 and 0.65, respectively. From the confirmatory factor analysis of the scales, the compliance indices were found to be acceptable at 0.075 and 0.054. In the CANSAS compliance analysis conducted to determine the level of agreement between the independent observers the total Kappa value was 0.621. In the parallel form reliability testing, two of the need levels were found to vary between 0.431 and 0.936. Conclusion: From the results, this study concludes that CANSAS and CANSAS-P are valid and reliable tools for conducting assessments of individuals with severe mental disorders in Turkey. The CANSAS is administered by a mental health team, while CANSAS-P is completed by the individual with chronic mental impairment, making them both important tools for identifying the views of both the specialist and the individual. It is believed that with these tools, a cooperative service mentality can be formed in planning treatment and care. © 2019 by Journal of Psychiatric Nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Interrater reliability of the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule
    Andresen, R
    Caputi, P
    Oades, LG
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 34 (05): : 856 - 861
  • [2] Development and evaluation of a patient-rated version of the Camberwell assessment of need short appraisal schedule (CANSAS-P)
    Trauer, Tom
    Tobias, Glen
    Slade, Mike
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2008, 44 (02) : 113 - 124
  • [3] Development and Evaluation of a Patient-rated Version Of the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS-P)
    Tom Trauer
    Glen Tobias
    Mike Slade
    Community Mental Health Journal, 2008, 44 : 113 - 124
  • [4] CANSAS - Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule and other needs of persons with mental disorders assessment tools
    Dobrzyska, Ewelina
    Rymaszewska, Joanna
    Kiejna, Andrzej
    PSYCHIATRIA POLSKA, 2008, 42 (04) : 525 - 532
  • [5] The Turkish version of the Camberwell assessment of need for the elderly: A validity and reliability study
    Guzel, Aysun
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2023, 42 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [6] Measuring the needs of mental health patients in Greece: Reliability and validity of the Greek version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need
    Stefanatou, Pentagiotissa
    Giannouli, Eleni
    Konstantakopoulos, George
    Vitoratou, Silia
    Mavreas, Venetsanos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 60 (07) : 662 - 671
  • [7] THE CAMBERWELL ASSESSMENT OF NEED - THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS THE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH SEVERE MENTAL-ILLNESS
    PHELAN, M
    SLADE, M
    THORNICROFT, G
    DUNN, G
    HOLLOWAY, F
    WYKES, T
    STRATHDEE, G
    LOFTUS, L
    MCCRONE, P
    HAYWARD, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 167 : 589 - 595
  • [8] Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
    Svanborg, Cecilia
    Amer, Ahmed
    Nordenskjold, Axel
    Ramklint, Mia
    Soderberg, Per
    Tungstrom, Stefan
    Ginsberg, Ylva
    Hermansson, Liselotte
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [9] Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
    Cecilia Svanborg
    Ahmed Amer
    Axel Nordenskjöld
    Mia Ramklint
    Per Söderberg
    Stefan Tungström
    Ylva Ginsberg
    Liselotte Hermansson
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6