Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis

被引:32
|
作者
Gao, Chuan [1 ]
Xu, Gang [1 ]
Wang, Changyong [1 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinling Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 34 Yanggongjing, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy; Anastomotic leak; Diagnosis; Drainage amylase concentration; DRAIN AMYLASE; IVOR-LEWIS; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-019-0864-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundMinimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy is an important surgical approach for esophageal cancer. Anastomotic leak is one of its common and serious complications. We assumed that the preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators would predict or detect anastomotic leak.MethodsBetween December 2016 and July 2017, patients underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy were identified and their preoperative variables and postoperative test indicators were recorded. Fisher's exact test, 2-tailed unpaired t test, nonparametric test and logistic regression were used to compare these datum between patients with or without anastomotic leak (AL). Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the best cut-off value of drainage amylase concentration for distinguishing anastomotic leak.ResultsIn all the 96 patients included, 12 patients were diagnosed as anastomotic leak by the esophagram. No differences in preoperative variables were observed between patients with and without AL. Patients in AL group appeared to have a lower prealbumin concentration in AL group on POD (postoperative day) 4(P=0.05), POD 5(P=0.04), POD 6 (P=0.06). Prealbumin concentration cutoff value of 128g/L on postoperative day 5 is 100.00% sensitive and 50.00% specific for predicting esophageal leaks. Drain amylases levels were higher in patients with anastomotic leak than those without anastomotic leak on POD 3(P=0.03), POD 4(P=0.01), POD 5(P<0.001), POD 6(P<0.001). The drain amylase cutoff value of 85IU/L on postoperative day 4 was 75.00% sensitive and 84.00% specific for detecting esophageal leaks; the cutoff value of 65IU/L on postoperative day 5 was 91.67% sensitive and 80.77% specific. The cutoff of 55/L on POD 6 is 100% sensitive and 86.96% specific.ConclusionDrainage amylase concentration on postoperative days may help to discover anastomotic leak in early stage after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. Prealbumin concentration below 128g/L on POD 5 might be potential risk factor for anastomotic leak.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis
    Chuan Gao
    Gang Xu
    Changyong Wang
    Dong Wang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 14
  • [2] Postoperative anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: A single center retrospective analysis
    Kariyawasam, M.
    Tan, J.
    Hong, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S15 - S16
  • [3] Risk Factors of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Focus on Preoperative and Intraoperative Lung Function
    Gao, Wenda
    Wang, Mingbo
    Su, Peng
    Zhang, Fan
    Huang, Chao
    Tian, Ziqiang
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 27 (02) : 75 - 83
  • [4] Evaluation of Fibrin Sealant in Prevention of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
    Huang, Yan
    Hu, Yihuai
    Lin, Yaobin
    Fu, Jianhua
    Wu, Jiadi
    Fang, Caiyan
    Liu, Min
    Hong, Yang
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 6390 - 6397
  • [5] Evaluation of Fibrin Sealant in Prevention of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study
    Yan Huang
    Yihuai Hu
    Yaobin Lin
    Jianhua Fu
    Jiadi Wu
    Caiyan Fang
    Min Liu
    Yang Hong
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 6390 - 6397
  • [6] Clinical analysis of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in a single center by a single medical group
    Zhu, Zi-yi
    Yong, Xu
    Luo, Rao-jun
    Wang, Yun-zhen
    JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2018, 19 (09): : 718 - 725
  • [7] Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience
    Simitian, Grigor S.
    Hall, David J.
    Leverson, Glen
    Lushaj, Entela B.
    Lewis, Erik E.
    Musgrove, Kelsey A.
    McCarthy, Daniel P.
    Maloney, James D.
    SURGERY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 11 : 26 - 32
  • [8] Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience
    Xiao-Dong Zheng
    Shi-Cong Li
    Chao Lu
    Wei-Ming Zhang
    Jian-Bin Hou
    Ke-Feng Shi
    Peng Zhang
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in 1023 consecutive esophageal cancer patients: a single-center experience
    Zheng, Xiao-Dong
    Li, Shi-Cong
    Lu, Chao
    Zhang, Wei-Ming
    Hou, Jian-Bin
    Shi, Ke-Feng
    Zhang, Peng
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [10] Intraoperative fluid therapy and postoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective study
    Yukiko Hikasa
    Satoshi Suzuki
    Yuko Mihara
    Shunsuke Tanabe
    Yasuhiro Shirakawa
    Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
    Hiroshi Morimatsu
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2020, 34 : 404 - 412