Use of chemometrics methods and multicriteria decision-making for site selection for sustainable on-site sewage effluent disposal

被引:53
|
作者
Khalil, WAS
Goonetilleke, A
Kokot, S
Carroll, S
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Phys & Chem Sci, Inorgan Mat Res Program, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
关键词
chemometrics methods; land capability; PROMETHEE and GAIA; sewage effluent disposal; subsurface effluent disposal;
D O I
10.1016/j.aca.2003.11.003
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper presents a study undertaken to evaluate site suitability for sewage effluent renovation based on physico-chemical characteristics of the soil. The results obtained showed that as the soil becomes acidic, the phosphorus concentration in the soil reduces accordingly. The chloride ion concentration was found to be a reliable indicator for evaluating the soil capacity to remove nitrogen. A high cation exchange capacity (CEC) can enhance the renovation of sewage effluent. Soils with high quartz content had a low CEC with high organic matter content (OM) being able to compensate. Therefore, an understanding of the micro-nutrients in the soil, organic matter content and chloride ion concentration are important. To facilitate a multi-variate approach for site selection, multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, PROMETHEE and GAIA, were applied for analysis of a sequence of three matrices consisting of 8, 16, and 48 soil site objects, respectively, and seven soil property parameters. Matrix models and the interpretation of results are discussed in detail. From these analyses, PROMETHEE II net outranking flows, phi, found that two sites were always among the top three ranks of the three matrix models, which suggested that they were the most suitable for sewage effluent renovation. The criteria CEC and OM, were particularly important for the selection of these better sites, but pH and Cl- attributes discriminated the weaker performing sites from the better ones; as well the PO43- and the NH3-N criteria were in general opposition to CEC, OM, pH and Cl- but were much less effective as discriminators. Consideration of net outranking flows suggested an approach method for the selection of other possibly suitable sites for sewage effluent renovation. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 56
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD FOR FACILITY SITE SELECTION
    LIANG, GS
    WANG, MJJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (11) : 2313 - 2330
  • [2] Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods
    Ramon San Cristobal, Jose
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 138 (06) : 751 - 758
  • [3] Multicriteria Decision Making in Site Selection for Nuclear Power Plants
    Tuncer, Berna
    Akkaya, Aysen D.
    Yucemen, M. Semih
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 210 (08) : 1366 - 1391
  • [4] Decision-Making Model for Convention Site Selection
    Huang, Han-Chen
    MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 538-541 : 895 - 900
  • [5] On-site decision-making in smartphone-mediated contexts
    Liu, Xuerui
    Wang, Dan
    Gretzel, Ulrike
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 88
  • [6] Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Support for Solid Waste Disposal Method and Site Selection
    Wibowo, Santoso
    Deng, Hepu
    Zhang, Xibao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 9TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2014, : 1774 - +
  • [7] Supplier selection using hybrid multicriteria decision-making methods
    Tusnial, Anirudh
    Sharma, Satyendra Kumar
    Dhingra, Parth
    Routroy, Srikanta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 70 (06) : 1393 - 1418
  • [8] A comparison of disposal methods for on-site sewage facilities within the state of Texas, USA
    Carr M.E.
    Jumper D.L.
    Yelderman Jr. J.C.
    The Environmentalist, 2009, 29 (4): : 381 - 387
  • [9] An integrated multi-criteria decision-making method for hazardous waste disposal site selection
    Feng, Jianghong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (06) : 8039 - 8070
  • [10] Temporary site selection and decision-making methods: a case study of Tehran, Iran
    Omidvar, Babak
    Baradaran-Shoraka, Mohammad
    Nojavan, Mehdi
    DISASTERS, 2013, 37 (03) : 536 - 553