An optical performance comparison of three concentrating solar power collector designs in linear Fresnel, parabolic trough, and central receiver

被引:68
|
作者
Kincaid, Nicholas [1 ]
Mungas, Greg [2 ]
Kramer, Nicholas [2 ]
Wagner, Michael [1 ]
Zhu, Guangdong [1 ]
机构
[1] NREL, Thermal Sci Grp, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Hyperlight Energy, Lakeside, CA USA
关键词
Concentrating solar power; Linear Fresnel; Parabolic trough; Central receiver; Power tower; Annual optical performance; SIMULATION; FLUIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.153
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The optical performance of a concentrating solar power (CSP) collector is critical to the overall efficiency of the system. This study presents a detailed optical comparison between three representative CSP collector designs including linear Fresnel, parabolic trough, and central-receiver technologies. Optical models are implemented in SolTrace, which is ray-tracing software developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. The ray-tracing algorithm is used to calculate a collector's design-point performance as well as its incidence-angle modifiers to evaluate the collector performance at any sun position during a typical meteorological year. The efficiency over a one-year period is then analyzed based on ray-tracing results. Using China Lake (California) as an example, the annual optical efficiency is 60% for the selected parabolic trough collector, 52% for the selected central-receiver technology, and 40% for the selected linear Fresnel collector. The parabolic trough has the highest optical performance among all. The selected central-receiver technology provides the most consistent seasonal production profile over the course of the year due to its two-axis-tracking ability but would suffer most from the increasing solar collector optical error. It is also shown that a dramatic cost reduction is required for the selected linear Fresnel technology to be competitive in the future energy market. Sensitivity of three CSP technologies to the deployment locations and the overall optical-error magnitude is also examined through annual performance analysis. The results will provide insights into a better understanding on inherent technical aspects of different CSP technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1121
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector power plants
    Morin, Gabriel
    Dersch, Juergen
    Platzer, Werner
    Eck, Markus
    Haeberle, Andreas
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [2] Optical Analysis of Solar Parabolic Trough Collector with Flat Concentrating Photovoltaic Receiver
    Kamnapure, Nikhilesh R.
    Reddy, K. S.
    [J]. DYNAMICS OF MACHINES AND MECHANISMS, INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2014, 592-594 : 2396 - 2403
  • [3] Study on trough receiver for linear concentrating solar collector
    Zhai, Hui
    Dai, Yanjun
    Wu, Jingyi
    Wang, Ruzhu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF ISES SOLAR WORLD CONGRESS 2007: SOLAR ENERGY AND HUMAN SETTLEMENT, VOLS I-V, 2007, : 711 - 715
  • [4] Sensitivity analysis on optical performance of a novel linear Fresnel concentrating solar power collector
    Kincaid, Nicholas
    Mungas, Greg
    Kramer, Nick
    Zhu, Guangdong
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 180 : 383 - 390
  • [5] Economic Comparison of Parabolic trough Collector and Linear Fresnel Reflectors Power Plants
    El Hamdani, Fayrouz
    Abderafi, Souad
    Bounahmidi, Tijani
    Vaudreuil, Sebastien
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 7TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IRSEC), 2019, : 206 - 209
  • [6] Comparison of medium-size concentrating solar power plants based on parabolic trough and linear Fresnel collectors
    Cau, Giorgio
    Cocco, Daniele
    [J]. ATI 2013 - 68TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2014, 45 : 101 - 110
  • [7] Energetic Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector Systems
    Schenk, Heiko
    Hirsch, Tobias
    Feldhoff, Jan Fabian
    Wittmann, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (04):
  • [8] ENERGETIC COMPARISON OF LINEAR FRESNEL AND PARABOLIC TROUGH COLLECTOR SYSTEMS
    Schenk, Heiko
    Hirsch, Tobias
    Feldhoff, Jan Fabian
    Wittmann, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY - 2012, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 333 - +
  • [9] Parabolic Trough Collector and Central Receiver Coupled with Fresnel Lens:Experimental Tests
    Angelica Palacios
    Dario Amaya
    Olga Ramos
    [J]. Machine Intelligence Research, 2020, 17 (04) : 572 - 587
  • [10] Parabolic Trough Collector and Central Receiver Coupled with Fresnel Lens: Experimental Tests
    Palacios, Angelica
    Amaya, Dario
    Ramos, Olga
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING, 2020, 17 (04) : 572 - 587