共 3 条
Environmental quality of Lower Little Bow River and riparian zone along an unfenced reach with off-stream watering
被引:15
|作者:
Miller, J.
[1
]
Chanasyk, D.
[2
]
Curtis, T.
[1
]
Entz, T.
[1
]
Willms, W.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词:
Beneficial management practices;
Off-stream watering without fencing;
Riparian health;
River water quality;
Rainfall simulation runoff;
Cattle behaviour;
CATTLE;
LIVESTOCK;
SOIL;
RUNOFF;
PHOSPHORUS;
ECOSYSTEMS;
SIMULATION;
LANDSCAPE;
BEHAVIOR;
IMPACTS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.006
中图分类号:
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号:
0901 ;
摘要:
The goal goal of beneficial management practices (BMPs) such as off-stream watering without fencing is to direct cattle away from rivers, improve the environmental quality of the riparian zone. and prevent or reduce river pollution. We conducted a four year (2005-2008) study on an unfenced 1.3 km reach of the Lower Little Bow (LLB) River in southern Alberta. Canada where three off-stream watering systems were installed 290 to >= 730m from the river in August. 2005. Our hypothesis was that off-stream watering would reduce cattle activity at the river, improve riparian health, prevent river pollution by cattle, and improve the soil, vegetative, and rainfall simulation runoff variables at a cattle access site near the river. Off-stream watering did not significantly (p>0.10) reduce the median number of cattle on the river bank, in the river, or drinking from the river one year later. However, there was a reduction of 20% (p=0.15) for median number of cattle on the river bank and a 72% reduction (p=0.20) for cattle in the river. The BMP moderately improved the riparian health score from 60% (2005) to 65% (2007). Our spatial analysis (upstream-downstream) of base-flow during the post-BMP period (2006-2008) suggested that off-stream watering prevented river pollution by cattle for the majority of water quality variables measured. Canopy cover at the cattle access site near the river was significantly (p <= 0.10) increased by 26-53% one and two years after the BMP. Two years after the BMP was implemented, total basal area, biomass. and mulch were significantly increased by 37-106%. while bare soil and NO3-N in surface soil were decreased by 38-89%, respectively. In contrast, other vegetative and soil properties were not significantly improved. Concentrations of the majority of N and P fractions in rainfall simulation runoff were not significantly reduced, and may be related to the high precipitation in the pre-BMP year of 2005. We accept the hypothesis that off-stream watering improved riparian health, prevented river pollution by cattle, and improved certain vegetative (canopy cover, total basal area, mulch, bare soil) and soil properties (soil NO3-N) near the river. However, we reject the hypothesis that off-stream watering improved other vegetation (live basal area) and soil properties (bulk density. NH4-N, total N and C). or improved rainfall simulation runoff quality near the river. Although we cannot statistically prove that the positive benefits of off-stream watering on certain environmental variables was due to reduced cattle activity, the non-significant reductions in cattle activity suggested this may be a possibility. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1505 / 1515
页数:11
相关论文