System for Measuring the Socio-Economic Sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union

被引:2
|
作者
Ryazantsev, Sergey, V [1 ]
Rostovskaya, Tamara K. [1 ]
Zolotareva, Olga A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Demog Res FCTAS RAS, 6-1 Fotievoy St, Moscow 119333, Russia
来源
EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION | 2021年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
Eurasian space; assessment of sustainable development; macroeconomic indicators; GDP dynamics; technological development; social sphere; quality of life; poverty; demographic development; fertility; TRADE;
D O I
10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-18
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Whether applying to individual countries or unions, the comparability of statistical indicators and their compliance with contemporary international initiatives is a serious problem. In particular, analysis of the macroeconomic indicators used for assessing the sustainability of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries has shown that they do not reflect the actual situation. In this regard, the creation of a unified system of indicators for determining the socio-economic sustainability of EAEU member states - as well as the EAEU as a whole - becomes an urgent task. Therefore, the present study aims to refine the system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space and develop recommendations for the selection of key parameters. By comparing socio-economic sustainability indicators published by international organisations (UNECE, OECD, Eurostat, CIS Statistical Committee) in the context of the development strategies of individual EAEU countries and the Union as a whole, the authors distinguish between basic and extended indicator types. Basic indicators comprise: the annual consolidated budget deficit; general government debt; annualised inflation rate; contribution of high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries to gross domestic product (GDP); contribution of innovative goods and services to total industrial exports; growth index of the proportion of reconstruction and modernisation investment to total capital investment; fertility rate; life expectancy at birth; poverty rate. Extended indicators include: GDP; economic growth; main international trade; external and national balance of payments; social. The applicability and relevance of the proposed system for measuring the socio-economic sustainability of the Eurasian space is confirmed by statistical analysis of EAEU member state data (including correlation analysis). The results showed that the presented system of indicators reflects the actual development of the EAEU countries, contributing to informed decision-making both at the level of the EAEU member states and at the level of the Union as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 986
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RISKS OF THE INTEGRATION PROCESSES WITHIN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION
    Osadchaya, Galina
    Kireev, Egor
    Seleznyov, Igor
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, : 480 - 486
  • [2] Socio-economic sustainability of cities
    Gonzalez Sanfiel, Andres M.
    [J]. CIUDADES-REVISTA DEL INSTITUTO UNIVERSITARIO DE URBANISTICA DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID, 2019, 22 : 197 - 202
  • [3] ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY AND ROBUSTNESS
    Karppi, Ilari
    Kultalahti, Olli
    Kultalahti, Jukka
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2012, 19 (02) : 5 - 7
  • [4] ON MEASURING SOCIO-ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY
    CIBULKA, J
    [J]. POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 1983, 31 (08) : 793 - 812
  • [5] The structure, evolution and sustainability of urban socio-economic system
    Liu, G. Y.
    Yang, Z. F.
    Su, M. R.
    Chen, B.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 10 : 2 - 9
  • [6] Socio-economic sustainability of the fadama system in the drylands of Nigeria
    Olofin, E
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY, 1996, 81 (353) : 377 - 380
  • [7] SOCIO-ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY OF MUNICIPAL AREAS
    Shuvaev, Alexander
    Berezhnoy, Vladimir
    Berezhnaya, Olga
    Chayka, Valeriya
    Churakova, Marina
    [J]. INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (03): : 5763 - 5769
  • [8] Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important?
    Turrell, G
    Hewitt, B
    Patterson, C
    Oldenburg, B
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2003, 6 (02) : 191 - 200
  • [9] The effect of scaling and connection on the sustainability of a socio-economic resource system
    Muneepeerakul, Rachata
    Qubbaj, Murad R.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 77 : 123 - 128
  • [10] Measuring the socio-economic bipolarization phenomenon
    Stefanescu, Stefan
    [J]. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2008, 9 (01): : 149 - 161