Selection of internal fixation method for femoral intertrochanteric fractures using a finite element method

BACKGROUND Failure to fix unstable intertrochanteric fractures impairs return to daily activities. AIM To simulate five different internal fixation methods for unstable proximal femoral fractures. METHODS A three-dimensional model of the femur was established from sectional computed tomography images, and an internal fixation model was established. Finite element analysis of the femur model was established, and three intertrochanteric fracture models, medial defect, lateral defect, and medial-lateral defects, were simulated. Displacement and stress distribution after fixation with a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA), integrated dual-screw fixation (ITN), PFNA + wire, PFNA + plate, and PFNA + wire + plate were compared during daily activities. RESULTS The maximum displacement and stress of PFNA and ITN were 3.51 mm/473 MPa and 2.80 mm/588 MPa for medial defects; 2.55 mm/288 MPa and 2.10 mm/307 MPa for lateral defects; and 3.84 mm/653 MPa and 3.44 mm/641 MPa for medial-lateral defects, respectively. For medial-lateral defects, reconstructing the medial side alone changed the maximum displacement and stress to 2.79 mm/515 MPa; reconstructing the lateral side changed them to 3.72 mm/608 MPa, when both sides were reconstructed, they changed to 2.42 mm/309 MPa. CONCLUSION For medial defects, intramedullary fixation would allow early low-intensity rehabilitation exercise, and ITN rather than PFNA reduces the risk of varus and cut-out; for lateral wall defects or weakness, intramedullary fixation allows higher-intensity rehabilitation exercise, and ITN reduces the risk of varus. For both medial and lateral defects, intramedullary fixation alone will not allow early functional exercise, but locating lateral or medial reconstruction will. For defects in both the inner and outer sides, if reconstruction cannot be completed, ITN is more stable.