Comparison of methane production by co-digesting fruit and vegetable waste with first stage and second stage anaerobic digester sludge from a two stage digester

被引:9
|
作者
Park, Nathan D. [1 ]
Thring, Ronald W. [1 ]
Helle, Steve S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
anaerobic digestion; co-digestion; fruit vegetable waste; organic waste; sewer sludge;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2012.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) was co-digested with first stage (FSS) and second stage anaerobic digester sludge (SSS) separately, over the course of 10 days, in batch reactors. Addition of FVW significantly increased the methane production in both sludges. After 10 days of digestion FSS + FVW produced 514 +/- 57 L CH4 kg VSadded-1 compared with 392 +/- 16 L CH4 for the SSS vertical bar FVW. The increased methane yield was most likely due to the higher inoculum substrate ratio of the FSS. The final VS and COD contents of the sewer sludge and FVW mixtures were not significantly different from the control values suggesting that all of the FVW added was degraded within 10 days. It is recommended that FVW be added to the first stage of the anaerobic digester in order to maximize methane generation.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1257
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-stage biogas production by co-digesting molasses wastewater and sewage sludge
    Lee, Jung-Yeol
    Yun, Jeonghee
    Kim, Tae Gwan
    Wee, Daehyun
    Cho, Kyung-Suk
    BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2014, 37 (12) : 2401 - 2413
  • [2] Two-stage biogas production by co-digesting molasses wastewater and sewage sludge
    Jung-Yeol Lee
    Jeonghee Yun
    Tae Gwan Kim
    Daehyun Wee
    Kyung-Suk Cho
    Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2014, 37 : 2401 - 2413
  • [3] Biogas production and microbial community structure in a stable-stage of a two-stage anaerobic digester
    Garcia-Ruiz, Maria J.
    Castellano-Hinojosa, Antonio
    Armato, Caterina
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Alejandro
    Gonzalez-Lopez, Jesus
    Osorio, Francisco
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (02)
  • [4] Comparison of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and activated sludge for hydrogen and methane production
    Baldi, F.
    Pecorini, I.
    Lannelli, R.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 : 1755 - 1765
  • [5] Sulfate in anaerobic co-digester accelerates methane production from food waste and waste activated sludge
    Zan, Feixiang
    Hao, Tianwei
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 298 (298)
  • [6] A Two-Stage Anaerobic Digester of Pig Manure and Food Waste for Biogas Production with Heat Exchanger
    Somsila, Praphanpong
    Teeboonma, Umphisak
    Khabuanchalad, Supatra
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2021, 25 (10): : 123 - 132
  • [7] Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal sewage sludge and fruit/vegetable waste: effect of different mixtures on digester stability and methane yield
    Arhoun, Brahim
    Villen-Guzman, Maria D.
    Vereda-Alonso, Carlos
    Miguel Rodriguez-Maroto, Jose
    Garcia-Herruzo, Francisco
    Gomez-Lahoz, Cesar
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 54 (07): : 628 - 634
  • [8] Eliminating methanogenic activity in hydrogen reactor to improve biogas production in a two-stage anaerobic digestion process co-digesting municipal food waste and sewage sludge
    Zhu, Heguang
    Parker, Wayne
    Conidi, Daniela
    Basnar, Robert
    Seto, Peter
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (14) : 7086 - 7092
  • [9] Valorization of fruit and vegetable waste in a novel three-stage hybrid anaerobic digester for enhanced biogas production: Performance study and microbial community analysis
    Chatterjee, Biswabandhu
    Mazumder, Debabrata
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 209
  • [10] An on-site prototype two-stage anaerobic digester for co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge for biogas production from high-rise building
    Ratanatamskul, C.
    Wattanayommanaporn, O.
    Yamamoto, K.
    INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 2015, 102 : 143 - 148