Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States

被引:37
|
作者
Gruenebaum, Amos [1 ]
McCullough, Laurence B. [2 ]
Brent, Robert L. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Arabin, Birgit [6 ,7 ]
Levene, Malcolm I. [8 ]
Chervenak, Frank A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Obstet, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Alfred I DuPont Hosp Children, Wilmington, DE USA
[6] Univ Marburg, Ctr Mother & Child, Marburg, Germany
[7] Clara Angela Fdn, Berlin, Germany
[8] Univ Leeds, Div Pediat & Child Hlth, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
home birth; midwives; perinatal risks; VAGINAL BIRTH; CESAREAN DELIVERY; HOSPITAL BIRTHS; CERTIFICATE; RELIABILITY; MIDWIVES; OUTCOMES; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the perinatal risks of midwife-attended planned home births in the United States from 2010 through 2012 and compared them with recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) for planned home births. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics birth certificate data files from 2010 through 2012 were utilized to analyze the frequency of certain perinatal risk factors that were associated with planned midwife-attended home births in the United States and compare them with deliveries performed in the hospital by certified nurse midwives. Home birth deliveries attended by others were excluded; only planned home births attended by midwives were included. Hospital deliveries attended by certified nurse midwives served as the reference. Perinatal risk factors were those established by ACOG and AAP. RESULTS: Midwife-attended planned home births in the United States had the following risk factors: breech presentation, 0.74% (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.87-3.56); prior cesarean delivery, 4.4% (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 2.0-2.17); twins, 0.64% (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.84-2.31); and gestational age 41 weeks or longer, 28.19% (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.68-1.74). All 4 perinatal risk factors were significantly higher among midwife-attended planned home births when compared with certified nurse midwives-attended hospital births, and 3 of 4 perinatal risk factors were significantly higher in planned home births attended by non-American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives (other midwives) when compared with home births attended by certified nurse midwives. Among midwife-attended planned home births, 65.7% of midwives did not meet the ACOG and AAP recommendations for certification by the American Midwifery Certification Board. CONCLUSION: At least 30% of midwife-attended planned home births are not low risk and not within clinical criteria set by ACOG and AAP, and 65.7% of planned home births in the United States are attended by non-AMCB certified midwives, even though both AAP and ACOG state that only AMCB-certified midwives should attend home births.
引用
收藏
页码:350.e1 / 350.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States
    Snyder, Ashley
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (02) : 295 - 295
  • [2] Perinatal Risks of Planned Home Births in the United States
    Gruenebaum, Amos
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    Brent, Robert L.
    Arabin, Birgit
    Levene, Malcolm I.
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (07) : 428 - 430
  • [3] Selected perinatal outcomes associated with planned home births in the United States
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Snowden, Jonathan M.
    King, Tekoa L.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (04)
  • [4] Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home births
    Barron, SL
    Blain, P
    Bullough, CHW
    Carney, T
    Gomersall, R
    Herve, J
    Hey, EN
    Irani, A
    Johnson, FS
    Lamb, W
    Lowry, MF
    Lawson, JB
    Layton, R
    Morris, D
    Morrell, P
    Parsons, L
    Reid, W
    Ryall, A
    Thomson, R
    Platt, MW
    Welch, RG
    Wright, C
    West, S
    Wyllie, J
    Young, G
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7068): : 1306 - 1309
  • [5] Characteristics of Planned and Unplanned Home Births in 19 States
    Declercq, Eugene
    MacDorman, Marian F.
    Menacker, Fay
    Stotland, Naomi
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [6] Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia - Home births are not justified in Australia
    Sullivan, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7183): : 605 - 606
  • [7] An immutable truth: planned home births in the United States result in avoidable adverse neonatal outcomes
    Grunebaum, Amos
    Bornstein, Eran
    Katz, Adi
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : 138 - 140
  • [8] Trends in Unattended Home Births in the United States
    Grunebaum, Amos
    Chervenak, Frank A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 75S - 75S
  • [9] Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and Perinatal mortality rates, an observational study
    Jacoba van der Kooy
    Erwin Birnie
    Semiha Denktas
    Eric A.P Steegers
    Gouke J. Bonsel
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [10] Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and Perinatal mortality rates, an observational study
    van der Kooy, Jacoba
    Birnie, Erwin
    Denktas, Semiha
    Steegers, Eric A. P.
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17