Pharmacodynamic monitoring of the conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable kidney-allograft recipients

被引:17
|
作者
Boehler, Torsten [1 ]
Canivet, Cindy [1 ]
Galvani, Sylvain [1 ]
Therville, Nicole [1 ]
Salvayre, Robert [1 ]
Negre-Salvayre, Anne [1 ]
Durand, Dominique [2 ]
Thomsen, Mogens [1 ]
Rostaing, Lionel [2 ]
Kamar, Nassim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHU Rangueil, Inst Louis Bugnard, IFR 31, INSERM,U858,Equipe 10, Toulouse, France
[2] CHU Rangueil, Dept Nephrol & Multiorgon Transplantat, F-31059 Toulouse, France
关键词
therapeutic drug monitoring; pharmacodynamics; mycophenolic acid; mycophenolate mofetil; enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium; kidney transplantation;
D O I
10.1016/j.intimp.2008.01.023
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The formulations of mycophenolic acid, i.e., mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), seem to have different pharmacokinetic profiles. The aim of this study was to compare the effects MMF and EC-MPS on T-cell proliferation, T-cell activation, T-cell function, and lymphocyte subsets. Clinical study and methods: Ten stable kidney-transplant patients on standard maintenance therapy of tacrolimus and MMF (1 g/d), with or without steroids, were converted from MMF to EC-MPS at equivalent dose (720 mg/d). Tacrolimus and steroid doses remained unchanged before, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months (M) after conversion. Intra T-lymphocyte cytokines IL-2 and TNF-alpha, lymphocyte-activation surface markers (CD25 and CD71), T-cell proliferation (PCNA+ PIhigh), total lymphocyte count, as well as lymphocytes subsets (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, NK cells) were measured by flow cytometry before conversion and at M1, M2, M3, and M6. Results: We found no significant differences of MMF versus EC-MPS on lymphocyte function. T-cell proliferation and T-cell activation (CD25 and CD71 expression), but not cytokine expression (TNF-alpha and IL-2), showed a trend to increase after conversion from MMF to EC-MPS. Total lymphocyte, CD2, CD3, CD4, CD8, and NK cells counts were not significantly modified. Conclusion: This study revealed a trend to a lower immunosuppression with EC-MPS as compared to MMF in stable renal transplant patients. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 773
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium have similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in stable renal allograft recipients
    Budde, K
    Glander, P
    Mai, I
    Hahn, U
    Roblitz, H
    Bohler, T
    Waiser, J
    Neumayer, HH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 : 367A - 367A
  • [2] Safety assessment of the conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in stable renal transplant recipients
    Massari, P
    Duro-Garcia, V
    Girón, F
    Hernández, E
    Juárez, F
    Castro, C
    Toledo, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (02) : 916 - 919
  • [3] Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: Safe conversion from mycophenolate mofetil in maintenance renal transplant recipients
    Budde, K
    Glander, P
    Diekmann, F
    Dragun, D
    Waiser, J
    Fritsche, L
    Neumayer, HH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (02) : 524S - 527S
  • [4] Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Improvement of Renal Transplant Recipients Converted From Mycophenolate Mofetil to Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium Drugs or Agents: Mycophenolate Mofetil and Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium
    Ortega, Francisco
    Sanchez-Fructuoso, Ana
    Maria Cruzado, Jose
    Carlos Gomez-Alamillo, Juan
    Alarcon, Antonio
    Pallardo, Lluis
    Maria Morales, Jose
    Oliver, Juan
    Guinea, Guillermo
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (04) : 426 - 432
  • [5] Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract disorders
    Darji, P.
    Vijayaraghavan, R.
    Thiagarajan, C. M.
    Sharma, R. K.
    Subbarao, B.
    Pishardy, R.
    Dakshinamurthy, K. V.
    Vijaykumar, R.
    Abraham, G.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Agarwal, L.
    Shah, B.
    Abraham, A.
    John, M.
    Sampathkumar, K.
    Das, T.
    Umesh, L.
    Sundar, S.
    Ballal, H.
    Jasuja, S.
    Saxena, S.
    Saha, T. K.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (07) : 2262 - 2267
  • [6] Quality of life in renal transplant recipients following conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
    Cofan, F.
    Rosich, E.
    Arias, M.
    Torregrosa, V.
    Oppenheimer, F.
    Campistol, J. M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (07) : 2179 - 2181
  • [7] Safety conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in children with stable renal transplant.
    Meneses, Rejane de Paula
    Kotsifas, Cecilia Hallush
    Olandoski, Karen Previch
    [J]. PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 11 : 54 - 54
  • [8] Comparison of the exposure of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation
    Belliere, Julie
    Esposito, Laure
    Gandia, Peggy
    Duffas, Jean Pierre
    Sallusto, Federico
    Cardeau-Desangles, Isabelle
    Del Bello, Arnaud
    Rostaing, Lionel
    Kamar, Nassim
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19 : 76 - 81
  • [9] Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus:: Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes
    Budde, Klemens
    Glander, Petra
    Kraemer, Bernhard K.
    Fischer, Wolfgang
    Hoffmann, Ute
    Bauer, Steffen
    Grohmann, Jana
    Neumayer, Hans-Hellmut
    Arns, Wolfgang
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 83 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [10] Comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with mycophenolate mofetil in living renal allograft transplantation
    Minz, M.
    Sharma, A.
    Heer, M.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (07) : 2041 - 2043