Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth

被引:8
|
作者
Doulaveris, Georgios [1 ]
Gallagher, Patience [1 ]
Romney, Elizabeth [1 ]
Richley, Michael [1 ]
Gebb, Juliana [1 ]
Rosner, Mara [2 ]
Dar, Pe'er [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Suite L4,1695 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
来源
关键词
Abdominal circumference; birth weight; fetal growth restriction; second trimester; small for gestational age; GROWTH RESTRICTION; WEIGHT; PREECLAMPSIA; ACCURACY; BIOMETRY; VELOCITY; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2018.1554039
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Infants that are small for gestational age (SGA) at birth are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the antenatal prediction of SGA is suboptimal. Objectives: We sought to: (1) examine the association between second trimester fetal abdominal circumference < 10% (2T-AClag) with SGA and other gestational and neonatal adverse outcomes; (2) assess 2T-AClag as a predictor of SGA. Study design: Retrospective study of 212 singleton gestations with 2T-AClag on routine ultrasound between 18-24 weeks. The study group was compared to 424 gestations without 2T-AClag for maternal characteristics as well as pregnancy and neonatal adverse outcomes. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the predictive value of 2T-AClag for SGA, adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. The screening model accuracy was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) was defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) less than the 10th percentile. Results: Gestations with 2T-AClag had higher rates of SGA (35.7 versus 11.6%, p < .0001), FGR (17 versus 1.7%, p < .0001), pregnancy induced hypertension (31.1 versus 17%, p < .0001), preeclampsia (14.6 versus 7.8%, 0 = 0.01), abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (30 versus 5.1%, p < .0001), indicated preterm birth (5.7 versus 1.9%, p = .01), primary cesarean birth (29.6 versus 20.1%, p = .01) and NICU admission (12.9 versus 6.4%, p = .009). After adjusting for maternal and gestational risk factors, 2T-AClag remained an independent risk factor for SGA (OR 4.53, 95%CI 2.91-7.05, p < .0001) and FGR (OR 11.57, 95%CI 5.02-26.65, p < .0001). The inclusion of 2T-AClag in a regression model with traditional risk factors, significantly improved the model's predictability for SGA and FGR (area under ROC curve increased from 0.618 to 0.723 and 0.653 to 0.819, respectively, p < .0001). Conclusions: Second trimester abdominal circumference (AC) lag is associated with an increased risk of SGA, FGR and other adverse outcomes. The inclusion of 2T-AClag in a screening model for prediction of SGA and FGR may improve the identification of this at-risk group and assist in customizing surveillance plans. Brief rationale Screening for newborns that are small for gestational age (SGA) at birth is currently suboptimal. Our study shows that second trimester abdominal circumference (AC) lag, using a parameter already routinely assessed during anatomic survey, is associated with SGA at birth and can improve current screening for growth restriction and other gestational, fetal and neonatal complications.
引用
收藏
页码:2415 / 2421
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abdominal circumference discordance for prediction of small for gestational age at birth in twin pregnancies
    Gelman, Milana
    Wilkof-Segev, Renana
    Gawie-Rotman, Moran
    Nadir, Erez
    Shrim, Alon
    Hallak, Mordechai
    Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (18): : 3573 - 3578
  • [2] Fetal abdominal circumference as an early marker in prediction of small for gestational age newborns
    Fuchs, Anna
    Heiselman, Cassandra
    Peralta, Leslie
    Gorman, Megan
    Umesh, Vaibhavi
    Abuzeid, Omar
    Garretto, Diana
    Herrera, Kimberly
    Hussain, Ayesha
    Garry, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S363 - S363
  • [3] Can serial measurements of fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester predict small for gestational age and late fetal-growth restrictions?
    Sahin, Mefkure Eraslan
    Madendag, Ilknur Col
    [J]. CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (01): : 102 - 106
  • [4] The association between second trimester estimated fetal weight and small for gestational age at birth
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Gettenberg, Gabrielle
    Stern, Erica
    Schwartz, Joshua J.
    Kim, Renita
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (15): : 2398 - 2402
  • [5] Third trimester abdominal circumference alone is comparable to estimated fetal weight to predict small for gestational age at birth: a meta-analysis
    Blue, Nathan R.
    Perez, Jose M.
    Holbrook, Bradley D.
    Nirgudkar, Pranita A.
    Mozurkewich, Ellen L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S151 - S152
  • [6] Can Abdominal Circumference in the Second Trimester Predict the Large for Gestational Age Neonate?
    Schwartz, Rachelle A.
    Hachem, Lena
    Rosenn, Barak
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 19 (S3) : 372A - 372A
  • [7] Second trimester fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age
    Bitar, Ghamar
    Lee, Kyung Hyun
    Ciomperlik, Hailie
    Miller, Emily S.
    Natarajan, Shruti
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Torres, Eleazar E. Soto
    Andrade, Edgar Hernandez
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S504 - S504
  • [8] Sonographic second trimester fetal pancreas circumference assessment for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Gilboa, Y.
    Perlman, S.
    Geron, Y.
    Ofir, K.
    Ellert, A. Wiser
    Bardin, R.
    Achiron, R.
    Kivilevitch, Z.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 62 : 249 - 249
  • [9] Is fetal abdominal circumference predictive of small for gestational age birthweight in twin pregnancies?
    Febres-Cordero, Daniela A.
    Ajayi, Ayodele
    Reforma, Liberty G.
    Trochtenberg, Alyssa L.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Spiel, Melissa H.
    Collier, Ai-Ris Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S626 - S626
  • [10] Predictive Value of Fetal Abdominal Circumference in Diagnosing Small for Gestational Age Infants
    Kopparam, Rohini
    Matthews, Kathy
    Khan, Rana
    Grossman, Tracy B.
    Gelber, Shari
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 17S - 18S