COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health care workers in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:41
|
作者
Ackah, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Ameyaw, Louise [2 ,3 ]
Salifu, Mohammed Gazali [2 ,4 ]
Asubonteng, Delali Pearl Afi [5 ]
Yeboah, Cynthia Osei [1 ]
Annor, Eugene Narkotey [6 ]
Ankapong, Eunice Abena Kwartemaa [7 ]
Boakye, Hosea [8 ]
机构
[1] Korle Bu Teaching Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Accra, Ghana
[2] Univ Ghana, Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Accra, Ghana
[3] Achimota Hosp, Dept Med, Accra, Ghana
[4] Minist Hlth, Policy Planning Budgeting Monitoring & Evaluat Dir, Accra, Ghana
[5] GA East Municipal Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Accra, Ghana
[6] East Tennessee State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Johnson City, TN USA
[7] Univ Ghana, Sch Biomed & Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Accra, Ghana
[8] LEKMA Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Accra, Ghana
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0268711
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
IntroductionCoronavirus Disease (COVID-19) vaccine acceptance, and hesitancy amongst Health Care Workers (HCWs) on the African continent have been examined through observational studies. However, there are currently no comprehensive reviews among these cadre of population in Africa. Hence, we aimed to review the acceptance rate and possible reasons for COVID-19 vaccine non-acceptance/hesitancy amongst HCWs in Africa. MethodsWe searched Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, and Africa Journal Online from January, 2020 to September, 2021. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool adapted for cross-sectional studies was used to assess the quality of the retrieved studies. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to pool the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate. Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were performed. Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were also systematically analyzed. ResultsTwenty-one (21) studies were found to be eligible for review out of the 513 initial records. The estimated pooled COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate was 46% [95% CI: 37%-54%]. The pooled estimated COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate was 37% [95% CI: 27%-47%] in North Africa, 28% [95% CI: 20%-36%] in Central Africa, 48% [CI: 38%-58%] in West Africa, 49% [95% CI: 30%-69%] in East Africa, and 90% [CI: 85%-96%] in Southern Africa. The estimated pooled vaccine acceptance was 48% [95% CI:38%-57%] for healthcare workers, and 34% [95% CI:29%-39%] for the healthcare students. Major drivers and reasons were the side effects of the vaccine, vaccine's safety, efficacy and effectiveness, short duration of the clinical trials, COVID-19 infections, limited information, and social trust. ConclusionThe data revealed generally low acceptance of the vaccine amongst HCWs across Africa. The side effects of the vaccine, vaccine's safety, efficacy and effectiveness, short duration of the clinical trials, COVID-19 infections, limited information, and social trust were the major reasons for COVID-19 hesitancy in Africa. The misconceptions and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance amongst HCWs must be addressed as soon as possible in the continent to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates in Africa.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers in Africa, systematic review and meta-analysis
    Figa, Zerihun
    Temesgen, Tesfaye
    Zemeskel, Addisu Getnet
    Ganta, Moges
    Alemu, Asrat
    Abebe, Mesfin
    Ashuro, Zemachu
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE, 2022, 4
  • [2] COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among health care professionals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moltot, Tebabere
    Lemma, Tesfanesh
    Silesh, Mulualem
    Sisay, Moges
    Shewangizaw, Abayneh
    Getaneh, Temesgen
    Tsegaw, Birhan
    [J]. HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [3] COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shui, Xiaoling
    Wang, Fang
    Li, Ling
    Liang, Qian
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [4] Acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccine among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sahebi, Ali
    Ghomian, Zohreh
    Tahemejad, Azadeh
    Sadeghi, Mandi
    [J]. NURSING PRACTICE TODAY, 2023, 10 (04): : 286 - 304
  • [5] COVID-19 in health care workers - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sahu, Ankit Kumar
    Amrithanand, V. T.
    Mathew, Roshan
    Aggarwal, Praveen
    Nayer, Jamshed
    Bhoi, Sanjeev
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (09): : 1727 - 1731
  • [6] The Acceptance Rate Toward COVID-19 Vaccine in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Wake, Addisu Dabi
    [J]. GLOBAL PEDIATRIC HEALTH, 2021, 8
  • [7] COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy among Migrants, Refugees, and Foreign Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hajissa, Khalid
    Mutiat, Hammed-Akanmu
    Kaabi, Nawal Al
    Alissa, Mohammed
    Garout, Mohammed
    Alenezy, Anood A.
    Almaghrabi, Rana H.
    Alrasheed, Hayam A.
    Al-Subaie, Maha F.
    Alhani, Hatem M.
    Alshehri, Ahmad A.
    Almazni, Ibrahim Abdullah
    Alqahtani, Ali S.
    Bahwerth, Fayez Saeed
    Alqethami, Nourah Hashem
    Alzayer, Amal A.
    Rabaan, Ali A.
    [J]. VACCINES, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [8] COVID-19 vaccine booster dose effectiveness among health workers: systematic review & meta-analysis
    Bartolucci, L.
    Damiani, G.
    Pascucci, D.
    Marafon, D. Pires
    Laurenti, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [9] COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Galanis, Petros
    Vraka, Irene
    Katsiroumpa, Aglaia
    Siskou, Olga
    Konstantakopoulou, Olympia
    Katsoulas, Theodoros
    Mariolis-Sapsakos, Theodoros
    Kaitelidou, Daphne
    [J]. VACCINES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [10] Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Determinant Factors among General Public in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alemayehu, Astawus
    Demissie, Abebaw
    Yusuf, Mohammed
    Lencha, Abebe Gemechu
    Oljira, Lemessa
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 9