A decision support model for identification and prioritization of key performance indicators in the logistics industry

被引:69
|
作者
Kucukaltan, Berk [1 ]
Irani, Zahir [2 ]
Aktas, Emel [3 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Sch Appl Sci, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
[2] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Bedford, England
关键词
Logistics performance indicators; Balanced scorecard; ANP; Multi-criteria decision making; Stakeholders; Social media; SUSTAINABILITY BALANCED SCORECARD; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; 3RD-PARTY LOGISTICS; REVERSE LOGISTICS; MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS; SERVICE PROVIDERS; NETWORK; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.045
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Performance measurement of logistics companies is based upon various performance indicators. Yet, in the logistics industry, there are several vaguenesses, such as deciding on key indicators and determining interrelationships between performance indicators. In order to resolve these vaguenesses, this paper first presents the stakeholder-informed Balanced Scorecard (BSC) model, by incorporating financial (e.g. cost) and non-financial (e.g. social media) performance indicators, with a comprehensive approach as a response to the major shortcomings of the generic BSC regarding the negligence of different stakeholders. Subsequently, since the indicators are not independent of each other, a robust multi-criteria decision making technique, the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method is implemented to analyze the interrelationships. The integration of these two techniques provides a novel way to evaluate logistics performance indicators from logisticians' perspective. This is a matter that has not been addressed in the logistics industry to date, and as such remains a gap that needs. to be investigated. Therefore, the proposed model identifies key performance indicators as well as various stakeholders in the logistics industry, and analyzes the interrelationships among the indicators by using the ANP. Consequently, the results show that educated employee (15.61%) is the most important indicator for the competitiveness of logistics companies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 358
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key activities, decision variables and performance indicators of reverse logistics
    Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
    [J]. 24TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2017, 61 : 257 - 262
  • [2] Identification and Prioritization of Key Performance Indicators for the Construction Small and Medium Enterprises
    Okudan, Ozan
    Budayan, Cenk
    Arayici, Yusuf
    [J]. TEKNIK DERGI, 2022, 33 (05): : 12635 - 12661
  • [3] A Decision Support Framework based on FCM for Selecting Key Performance Indicators
    Oukhay, Fadwa
    Ben Romdhane, Taieb
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED SYSTEMS AND EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES IC_ASET'2022), 2022, : 97 - 102
  • [4] Fuzzy AHP as a tool for prioritization of key performance indicators
    Kaganski, Sergei
    Majak, Juri
    Karjust, Kristo
    [J]. 51ST CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 72 : 1227 - 1232
  • [5] KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE CREATIVE INDUSTRY
    Vartiak, Lukas
    Garbarova, Miriam
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2024, 10 (02) : 14 - 23
  • [6] Decision Support System for Analyzing Key Performance Indicators in Construction Projects Management
    Ansari, R.
    Banihashemi, S. A.
    Taherkhani, R.
    Moradi, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2022, 35 (05): : 865 - 874
  • [7] Identifying Key Performance Indicators to be used in Logistics 4.0 and Industry 4.0 for the needs of sustainable municipal logistics by means of the DEMATEL method
    Torbacki, Witold
    Kijewska, Kinga
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE GREEN CITIES - GREEN LOGISTICS FOR GREENER CITIES, 2019, 39 : 534 - 543
  • [8] Key Performance Indicators for Decision Support in Building Retrofit Planning: An Italian Case Study
    Abba, Ilaria
    Crespi, Giulia
    Vergerio, Giulia
    Becchio, Cristina
    Corgnati, Stefano Paolo
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [9] Construction industry benchmark of key performance indicators
    Akintoye, A
    Chinyio, E
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION AND GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS, VOLS 1 AND 2: THE ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, 2003, : 1077 - 1091
  • [10] The Survey of Thailand's Military Logistics Key Performance Indicators
    Parapob, S.
    Suthikarnnarunai, N.
    Buranaprapa, P.
    [J]. WCECS 2009: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1244 - 1247