CUMULUS CELLS GENE EXPRESSION PROFILE FOLLOWING CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION WITH HP-HMG OR rFSH IN A GnRH ANTAGONIST PROTOCOL: NEW INDICATORS OF OVARIAN MICROENVIRONMENT HEALTH

被引：0
|
作者：
Dechaud, H.
Assou, S.
Moussaddykine, S.
Van den Abbeel, E.
Aasted, H.
Hamamah, S.
机构：
[1] Hop St Eloi, Inst Rech Biotherap, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, Herault, France
[2] Hop Arnaud de Villeneuve, Dept Reprod Biol, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, Herault, France
[3] INSERM, U1040, Montpellier, Herault, France
[4] UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Ferring Pharmaceut, Global Clin Res & Dev Reprod Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
来源：
FERTILITY AND STERILITY | 2011年 / 96卷 / 03期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.987
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：S257 / S258
页数：2
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Cumulative Live Birth Rates Following Stimulation With Corifollitropin Alfa Compared With hp-hMG in a GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Ovarian Responders
    Errazuriz, Joaquin
    Romito, Alessia
    Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
    Frederix, Billie
    Racca, Analissa
    De Munck, Neelke
    Tournaye, Herman
    De Vos, Michel
    Blockeel, Christophe
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [2] A pilot study comparing corifollitropin alfa associated with hp-HMG versus high dose rFSH antagonist protocols for ovarian stimulation in poor responders
    Mendret-Pellerin, Stephanie
    Leperlier, Florence
    Reignier, Arnaud
    Lefebvre, Tiphaine
    Barriere, Paul
    Freour, Thomas
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2020, 23 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [3] Does early respons on ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa versus hp-hMG influence live-birth rates in a GnRH antagonist protocol?
    De Rijdt, S.
    Errazuriz, J.
    Santos-Ribeiro, S.
    Drakopoulos, P.
    Racca, A.
    Galvao, A.
    De Munck, N.
    Camus, M.
    Tournaye, H.
    Blockeel, C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 : 459 - 460
  • [4] New meta-analysis of randomized HP-HMG versus RFSH clinical studies in ovarian stimulation before FIV/ICSI
    Afnan, M.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2008, 37 (01): : 2 - 4
  • [5] Comparison of cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonists and antagonists
    Devjak, R.
    Tacer, K. Fon
    Juvan, P.
    Rozman, D.
    Klun, I. Virant
    Bokal, E. Vrtacnik
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I88 - I89
  • [6] COMPARISON OF FSH AND FSH-HMG REGIMEN IN GnRH ANTAGONIST USING CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOL
    Fujiwara, T.
    Tabata, C.
    Tsutsumi, O.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S278 - S278
  • [7] Cumulus Cells Gene Expression Profiling in Terms of Oocyte Maturity in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Using GnRH Agonist or GnRH Antagonist
    Devjak, Rok
    Tacer, Klementina Fon
    Juvan, Peter
    Klun, Irma Virant
    Rozman, Damjana
    Bokal, Eda Vrtacnik
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [8] FOLLICULAR MICROENVIRONMENT GENE EXPRESSION PROFILE ACCORDING TO OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION PROTOCOLS (hMG VS. recFSH): NEW INDICATORS OF OVARIAN RESPONSE.
    Dechaud, H.
    Assou, S.
    Anahory, T.
    Hedon, B.
    De Vos, J.
    Hamamah, S.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S158 - S158
  • [9] Differences in granulosa cell gene expression in rFSH versus highly purified hMG-induced controlled ovarian stimulation
    Grondahl, M. L.
    Borup, R.
    Lee, Y.
    Myrhoj, V.
    Smed, S.
    Jager, A. C.
    Meinertz, H.
    Sorensen, S.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (01) : 118 - 118
  • [10] Human cumulus cells gene expression profile according to ovarian hyperstimulation protocols (hMG vs. recFSH)
    Hamamah, S.
    Gasca, S.
    Pellestor, F.
    Pantesco, V.
    De Vos, J.
    Klein, B.
    Dechaud, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I5 - I6
123