共 4 条
Transdiagnostic associations across communication, cognitive, and behavioural problems in a developmentally at-risk population: a network approach
被引:17
|作者:
Mareva, Silvana
[1
]
Holmes, Joni
[1
]
Gathercole, Susan
Astie, Duncan
Manly, Tom
Baker, Kate
Kievit, Rogier
Bathelt, Joe
Bignardi, Giacomo
Bishop, Sarah
Bottacin, Erica
Bridge, Lara
Bryant, Annie
Butterfield, Sally
Byrne, Elizabeth
Crickmore, Gemma
Daly, Fanchea
Emery, Tina
Ford, Laura
Fuhrmann, Delia
Gadie, Andrew
Gharooni, Sara
Guy, Jacalyn
Hawkins, Erin
Jarosiawska, Agnierska
Johnson, Amy
Ng-Cordell, Elise
O'Brien, Sinead
O'Leary, Cliodhna
Rennie, Joseph
Simpson-Kent, Ivan
Siugidaite, Roma
Smith, Tess
Uh, Stepheni
Woolgar, Francesca
Zhang, Mengya
机构:
[1] Univ Cambridge, Med Res Council Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
ADHD;
Language;
Executive function;
Learning difficulties;
Behaviour problems;
Network analysis;
ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER;
WORKING-MEMORY;
LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT;
EXECUTIVE FUNCTION;
ADHD TRAITS;
CHILDREN;
COMORBIDITY;
HYPERACTIVITY;
SKILLS;
CLASSIFICATION;
D O I:
10.1186/s12887-019-1818-7
中图分类号:
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号:
100202 ;
摘要:
Background Communication, behavioural, and executive function problems often co-occur in childhood. Previous attempts to identify the origins of these comorbidities have typically relied on comparisons of different deficit groups and/or latent variable models. Here we apply a network approach to a heterogeneous sample of struggling learners to conceptualise these comorbidities as a dynamic system of interacting difficulties. Methods 714 children struggling with attention, learning, and/or memory were included. The sample consisted of children with both diagnosed (41%) and undiagnosed difficulties. The conditional independence network of parent ratings of everyday behaviour, cognition, and communication was estimated. Results A clustering coefficient identified four interconnected areas of difficulty: (1) structural language and learning; (2) pragmatics and peer relationships; (3) behavioural and emotional problems; and (4) cognitive skills. Emotional and behavioural symptoms shared multiple direct connections with pragmatic abilities and cognitive problems, but not with structural language skills or learning problems. Poor structural language and cognitive skills were associated with learning problems. Centrality indices highlighted working memory and language coherence as symptoms bridging different problem areas. Conclusion The network model identified four areas of difficulty and potential bridging symptoms. Although the current analytic framework does not provide causal evidence, it is possible that bridging symptoms may be the origins of comorbidities observed on a dimensional level; problems in these areas may cascade and activate problems in other areas of the network. The potential value of applying a dynamic systems network approach to symptoms of developmental disorders is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文