The importance and complexity of regret in the measurement of 'good' decisions: a systematic review and a content analysis of existing assessment instruments

被引:73
|
作者
Joseph-Williams, Natalie [1 ]
Edwards, Adrian [1 ]
Elwyn, Glyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
关键词
decision quality; decision making; instrument; patient decisions; regret; scale; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MULTIPLE REFERENCE POINTS; PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PROSTATE-CANCER; CONSEQUENCES; ASSOCIATION; INTENTION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00621.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background or context Regret is a common consequence of decisions, including those decisions related to individuals' health. Several assessment instruments have been developed that attempt to measure decision regret. However, recent research has highlighted the complexity of regret. Given its relevance to shared decision making, it is important to understand its conceptualization and the instruments used to measure it. Objectives To review current conceptions of regret. To systematically identify instruments used to measure decision regret and assess whether they capture recent conceptualizations of regret. Search strategy Five electronic databases were searched in 2008. Search strategies used a combination of MeSH terms (or database equivalent) and free text searching under the following key headings: 'Decision' and 'regret' and 'measurement'. Follow-up manual searches were also performed. Inclusion criteria Articles were included if they reported the development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure decision regret, or the use of a previously developed and tested instrument. Main results Thirty-two articles were included: 10 report the development and validation of an instrument that measures decision regret and 22 report the use of a previously developed and tested instrument. Content analysis found that existing instruments for the measurement of regret do not capture current conceptualizations of regret and they do not enable the construct of regret to be measured comprehensively. Conclusions Existing instrumentation requires further development. There is also a need to clarify the purpose for using regret assessment instruments as this will, and should, focus their future application.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 83
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of Instruments for Measurement of Delirium Severity A Systematic Review
    Jones, Richard N.
    Cizginer, Sevdenur
    Pavlech, Laura
    Albuquerque, Asha
    Daiello, Lori A.
    Dharmarajan, Kumar
    Gleason, Lauren J.
    Helfand, Benjamin
    Massimo, Lauren
    Oh, Esther
    Okereke, Olivia I.
    Tabloski, Patricia
    Rabin, Laura A.
    Yue, Jirong
    Marcantonio, Edward R.
    Fong, Tamara G.
    Hshieh, Tammy T.
    Metzger, Eran D.
    Erickson, Kristen
    Schmitt, Eva M.
    Inouye, Sharon K.
    Racine, Annie
    Schulman-Green, Dena
    Travison, Thomas
    Vasunilashorn, Sarinnapha
    Abrantes, Tatiana
    Armstrong, Brett
    Bertrand, Sylvia
    Butters, Angelee
    D'Aquila, Madeline
    Gallagher, Jacqueline
    Kettell, Jennifer
    Nee, Jacqueline
    Parisi, Katelyn
    Vella, Margaret
    Xu, Guoquan
    Weiner, Lauren
    Gou, Yun
    Tommet, Douglas
    Brown, Charles H.
    Cizginer, Sevdenur
    Clark, Diane
    Flaherty, Joseph H.
    Gleason, Anne
    Kolanowski, Ann M.
    Neufeld, Karen J.
    O'Connor, Margaret G.
    Pisani, Margaret A.
    Robinson, Thomas
    Verghese, Joe
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (02) : 231 - 239
  • [2] The measurement of episodic foresight: A systematic review of assessment instruments
    Miloyan, Beyon
    McFarlane, Kimberley A.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2019, 117 : 351 - 370
  • [3] Systematic Review on the Content of Outcome Measurement Instruments on Scar Quality
    Carriere, Michelle E.
    Kwa, Kelly A. A.
    de Haas, Louise E. M.
    Pijpe, Anouk
    Tyack, Zephanie
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    van Zuijlen, Paul P. M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (09)
  • [4] Assessment of symptom measurement instruments for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review
    Gerbens, L. A.
    Prinsen, C. A.
    Apfelbacher, C.
    Chalmers, J.
    Drucker, A.
    Kobyletzki, L.
    Nankervis, H.
    Svensson, A.
    Zhang, J.
    Spuls, P. I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 135 : S35 - S35
  • [5] Using the refined ICF Linking Rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation
    Ballert, Carolina S.
    Hopfe, Maren
    Kus, Sandra
    Mader, Luzius
    Prodinger, Birgit
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (05) : 584 - 600
  • [6] The measurement properties of existing lifestyle assessment tools are suboptimal: a systematic review
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Yong
    Xie, Xinling
    Wang, Zhi
    Liu, Yafei
    Guo, Bingwei
    Feng, Lei
    Kibir, Elminur
    Ding, Guowu
    Yin, Min
    Ge, Long
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023,
  • [7] Diabetes Mellitus Family Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Soares, Vania Lidia
    Lemos, Sara
    Barbieri-Figueiredo, Maria do Ceu
    Morais, Maria Carminda Soares
    Sequeira, Carlos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [8] Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review
    Horbach, Sophie E. R.
    Rongen, Amber P. M.
    Elbers, Roy G.
    van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M.
    Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.
    Spuls, Phyllis, I
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [9] Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review
    Sophie E. R. Horbach
    Amber P. M. Rongen
    Roy G. Elbers
    Chantal M. A. M. van der Horst
    Cecilia A. C. Prinsen
    Phyllis I. Spuls
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 1 - 17
  • [10] Identification and Assessment of Outcome Measurement Instruments in Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Richardson, George E.
    Millward, Christopher P.
    Mitchell, James W.
    Clark, Simon
    Wilby, Martin
    Marson, Anthony G.
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Srikandarajah, Nisaharan
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (06) : 1818 - 1826