Cognitive enhancement treatments for bipolar disorder: A systematic review and methodological recommendations

被引:75
|
作者
Miskowiak, Kamilla W. [1 ]
Carvalho, Andre F. [2 ,3 ]
Vieta, Eduard [4 ]
Kessing, Lars V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rigshosp, Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Copenhagen Psychiat Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Translat Psychiat Res Grp, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Clin Med, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[4] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Clin Inst Neurosci, IDIBAPS,CIBERSAM, Villarroel 170, E-08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
Cognitive dysfunction; Bipolar disorder; Intervention; Randomized controlled trials; Cognitive enhancement; Systematic review; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; NEUROCOGNITIVE FUNCTION; EUTHYMIC PATIENTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; MOOD; DYSFUNCTION; ERYTHROPOIETIN; IMPAIRMENT; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.08.011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Cognitive dysfunction is an emerging treatment target in bipolar disorder (BD). Several trials have assessed the efficacy of novel pharmacological and psychological treatments on cognition in BD but the findings are contradictory and unclear. A systematic search following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted on PubMed and Psychlnfo. Eligible articles reported randomized, controlled or open-label trials investigating pharmacological or psychological treatments targeting cognitive dysfunction in BD. The quality of the identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. We identified 19 eligible studies of which 13 were RCTs and six were open-label or non-randomized studies. The findings regarding efficacy on cognition were overall disappointing or preliminary, possibly due to several methodological challenges. For the RCTs, the risk of bias was high in nine cases, unclear in one case and low in three cases. Key reasons for the high risk of bias were lack of details on the randomization process, suboptimal handling of missing data and lack of a priori priority between cognition outcomes. Other challenges were the lack of consensus on whether and how to screen for cognitive impairment and on how to assess efficacy on cognition. In conclusion, methodological problems are likely to impede the success rates of cognition trials in BD. We recommend adherence to the CONSORT guidelines for RCTs, screening for cognitive impairment before inclusion of trial participants and selection of one primary cognition outcome. Future implementation of a 'neurocircuitry-based' biomarker model to evaluate neural target engagement is warranted. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1541 / 1561
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cognitive enhancement interventions for people with bipolar disorder: A systematic review of methodological quality, treatment approaches, and outcomes
    Tsapekos, Dimosthenis
    Seccomandi, Benedetta
    Mantingh, Tim
    Cella, Matteo
    Wykes, Til
    Young, Allan H.
    [J]. BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2020, 22 (03) : 216 - 230
  • [2] BIPOLAR DISORDER TREATMENTS AND OVARIAN CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Miniati, Mario
    Conversano, Ciro
    Palagini, Laura
    Buccianelli, Beatrice
    Fabrini, Mariagrazia
    Mancino, Maricia
    Laliscia, Concetta
    Marazziti, Donatella
    Paiar, Fabiola
    Gemignani, Angelo
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2020, 17 (05): : 300 - 313
  • [3] Impact of cognitive reserve on bipolar disorder: a systematic review
    Matsumoto, Kazuki
    Hamatani, Sayo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 14
  • [4] Neuroprogression and Cognitive Functioning in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review
    Taiane Cardoso
    Isabelle E. Bauer
    Thomas D. Meyer
    Flavio Kapczinski
    Jair C. Soares
    [J]. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2015, 17
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Misdiagnosis of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: Assessments and Recommendations
    Tabeer Afzal
    Justin Louis Hipolito
    Laura Jin
    [J]. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 2024, 52 : 659 - 670
  • [6] A Systematic Review of Misdiagnosis of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: Assessments and Recommendations
    Afzal, Tabeer
    Hipolito, Justin Louis
    Jin, Laura
    [J]. RESEARCH ON CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 52 (05): : 659 - 670
  • [7] Cognitive rehabilitation in bipolar spectrum disorder: A systematic review
    Razavi, Mahdiye Sarrafe
    Fathi, Mazyar
    Vahednia, Elham
    Ardani, Amir Rezaei
    Honari, Sara
    Akbarzadeh, Farzad
    Talaei, Ali
    [J]. IBRO NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2024, 16 : 509 - 517
  • [8] Neuroprogression and Cognitive Functioning in Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review
    Cardoso, Taiane
    Bauer, Isabelle E.
    Meyer, Thomas D.
    Kapczinski, Flavio
    Soares, Jair C.
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (09)
  • [9] Methodological considerations for the development of new treatments for bipolar disorder
    Potter, WZ
    Ozcan, ME
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 33 : S84 - S98
  • [10] Psychoeducational and cognitive behavioral treatments of bipolar disorder
    Khazaal, Yasser
    Preisig, Martin
    Zullino, Daniele Fabio
    [J]. SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC, 2006, 31 (01): : 125 - 143