Branching time and doomsday

被引:1
|
作者
Andreoletti, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
关键词
branching time; doomsday; histories; open future; time; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1111/rati.12328
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Branching time is a popular theory of time that is intended to account for the openness of the future. Generally, branching time models the openness of the future by positing a multiplicity of concrete alternative futures mirroring all the possible ways the future could unfold. In the literature, a distinction is drawn among branching-time theories: those that make use of moment-based structures and those that employ history-based ones. In this paper, I introduce and discuss a particular kind of openness relative to the possibility that time ends (doomsday). I then show that whereas moment-based branching structures cannot represent this kind of openness, history-based structures can account for it. The conclusion is that history-based structures have an advantage over moment-based ones.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 90
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE TIME THEY POSTPONED DOOMSDAY
    FISHER, D
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 1985, 106 (1459) : 39 - 43
  • [2] Doomsday ...
    Meadows, Dennis
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2012, 213 (2848) : 28 - 28
  • [3] 'Doomsday'
    Brooke, Michael
    [J]. SIGHT AND SOUND, 2008, 18 (07): : 53 - 54
  • [4] Doomsday
    Kunaratnam, Neetha
    [J]. POETRY WALES, 2010, 46 (01): : 20 - 20
  • [5] Branching Allen -: Reasoning with intervals in branching time
    Ragni, M
    Wölfl, S
    [J]. SPATIAL COGNITION IV, REASONING, ACTION, INTERACTION, 2004, 3343 : 323 - 343
  • [6] 'DOOMSDAY'
    UNT, M
    [J]. MODERN INTERNATIONAL DRAMA, 1977, 10 (02): : 43 - 64
  • [7] Doomsday
    Shilling, AG
    [J]. FORBES, 2001, 168 (03): : 108 - 108
  • [8] DOOMSDAY
    ROBERTSON, J
    BOND, VP
    CRONKITE, EP
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1961, 133 (345) : 936 - &
  • [9] Events in branching time
    Wölfl S.
    [J]. Studia Logica, 2005, 79 (2) : 255 - 282
  • [10] FUTURE BRANCHING TIME
    KESSLER, G
    [J]. THEORIA, 1975, 41 : 89 - 95