Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. II. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year

被引:123
|
作者
Cianci, G
Burke, GW
Gaynor, JJ
Mattiazzi, A
Roth, D
Kupin, W
Nicolas, M
Ruiz, P
Rosen, A
Miller, J
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Div Transplantat, Dept Surg, Miami, FL 33101 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Med, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000101495.22734.07
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. In an attempt to reduce chronic calcineurin inhibitor induced allograft nephropathy in first cadaver and human leukocyte antigen non-identical living-donor renal transplantation, sirolimus (Siro) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was tested as adjunctive therapy, with planned dose reductions of tacrolimus (Tacro) over the first year postoperatively. Adjunctive Siro therapy with a similar dose reduction algorithm for Neoral (Neo) was included for comparison. Methods. The detailed dose reduction plan (Tacro and Siro, group A; Tacro and MMF, group B; Neo and Siro, group C) is described in our companion report in this issue of Transplantation. The present report documents function, patient and graft survival, protocol compliance, and adverse events. Results. As mentioned (in companion report), group demographics were similar. The present study shows no significant differences in 1-year patient and graft survival but does show a trend that points to more difficulties in group C by way of a rising slope of serum creatinine concentration (P=0.02) and decreasing creatinine clearance (P=0.04). There were more patients who discontinued the protocol plan in group C. Thus far, no posttransplant lymphomas have appeared, and infectious complications have not differed among the groups. However, a greater percentage of patients in group C were placed on antihyperlipidemia therapy, with an (unexpected) trend toward a higher incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus in this group. Group A required fewer, and group B the fewest, antihyperlipidemia therapeutic interventions (P<0.00001). Conclusions. This 1-year interim analysis of a long-term, prospective, randomized renal-transplant study indicates that decreasing maintenance dosage of Tacro with adjunctive Siro or MMF appears to point to improved long-term function, with reasonably few adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Gaynor, JJ
    Mattiazzi, A
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Nicolas, M
    Ruiz, P
    Rosen, A
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (02) : 244 - 251
  • [2] Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Versus Cyclosporine (Neoral®)/Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation: Seven Year Results.
    Guerra, Giselle
    Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
    Ciancio, Gaetano
    Zarak, Alberto
    Sageshima, Junichiro
    Roth, David
    Kupin, Warren
    Chen, Linda
    Hanson, Lois
    Tueros, Lissett
    Flores, Sandra
    Ruiz, Phillip
    Miller, Joshua
    Burke, George W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 325 - 325
  • [4] A Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: Three-year analysis
    Ciancio, G
    Burke, GW
    Gaynor, JJ
    Ruiz, P
    Roth, D
    Kupin, W
    Rosen, A
    Miller, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (06) : 845 - 852
  • [5] Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function and Survival in Prednisone-Free Regimens: Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Tacrolimus/Sirolimus
    Chhabra, Darshika
    Skaro, Anton I.
    Leventhal, Joseph R.
    Dalal, Pranav
    Shah, Gaurav
    Wang, Edward
    Gallon, Lorenzo
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (03): : 504 - 512
  • [6] Canadian multicentre trial of tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids versus neoral/mycophenolate mofetil/steroids in renal transplantation
    Busque, S
    Shoker, A
    Landsberg, D
    McAlister, V
    Halloran, P
    Shapiro, J
    Peets, J
    Schulz, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) : 1266 - 1267
  • [7] A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: Results at 1 year
    Mendez, R
    Gonwa, T
    Yang, HC
    Weinstein, S
    Jensik, S
    Steinberg, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [8] Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mychophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation
    Johnson, C
    Ahsan, N
    Gonwa, T
    Halloran, P
    Stegall, M
    Hardy, M
    Metzger, R
    Shield, C
    Rocher, L
    Scandling, J
    Sorensen, J
    Mulloy, L
    Light, J
    Corwin, C
    Danovitch, G
    Wachs, M
    VanVeldhuisen, P
    Salm, K
    Tolzman, D
    Fitzsimmons, WE
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (05) : 834 - 841
  • [9] Long-Term Outcome of a Prospective Randomized Trial of Conversion From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus Treatment After Renal Transplantation.
    El-Agroudy, A.
    Alarrayed, S.
    Ghareeb, S.
    Farid, E.
    Alhellow, H.
    Abdulla, S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 539 - 539
  • [10] Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function
    Liu, B
    Lin, ZB
    Ming, CS
    Zhang, WJ
    Chen, ZS
    Sha, B
    Zeng, FJ
    Chen, S
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (01) : 87 - 88