Combining Conformal Prediction and Genetic Programming for Symbolic Interval Regression

被引:3
|
作者
Pham Thi Thuong [1 ]
Nguyen Xuan Hoai [2 ]
Yao, Xin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Informat & Commun Technol, IT Dept, Thainguyen, Vietnam
[2] Hanoi Univ, HANU IT R&D Ctr, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Genetic Programming; Quantile Regression; Linear Quantile Regression; Quantile Regression Forests; Conformal Prediction; Interval Prediction; Symbolic Regression;
D O I
10.1145/3071178.3071280
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Symbolic regression has been one of the main learning domains for Genetic Programming. However, most work so far on using genetic programming for symbolic regression only focus on point prediction. The problem of symbolic interval regression is for each input to find a prediction interval containing the output with a given statistical confidence. This problem is important for many risk-sensitive domains (such as in medical and financial applications). In this paper, we propose the combination of conformal prediction and genetic programming for solving the problem of symbolic interval regression. We study two approaches called black-box conformal prediction genetic programming (black-box CPGP) and white-box conformal prediction genetic programming (white-box CPGP) on a number of benchmarks and previously used problems. We compare the performance of these approaches with two popular interval regressors in statistic and machine learning domains, namely, the linear quantile regression and quantile random forrest. The experimental results show that, on the two performance metrics, black-box CPGP is comparable to the linear quantile regression and not much worse than the quantile random forrest on validity and much better than them on efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1008
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression: A Study on Fish Weight Prediction
    Yang, Yunhan
    Xue, Bing
    Jesson, Linley
    Zhang, Mengjie
    [J]. 2021 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC 2021), 2021, : 588 - 595
  • [2] Genetic programming performance prediction and its application for symbolic regression problems
    Astarabadi, Samaneh Sadat Mousavi
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 502 : 418 - 433
  • [3] Sequential Symbolic Regression with Genetic Programming
    Oliveira, Luiz Otavio V. B.
    Otero, Fernando E. B.
    Pappa, Gisele L.
    Albinati, Julio
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING THEORY AND PRACTICE XII, 2015, : 73 - 90
  • [4] Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Kossinski, Dominik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 570 - 573
  • [5] Symbolic regression via genetic programming
    Augusto, DA
    Barbosa, HJC
    [J]. SIXTH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 173 - 178
  • [6] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [7] Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    He, Baihe
    Lu, Qiang
    Yang, Qingyun
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 946 - 954
  • [8] On improving genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Gustafson, S
    Burke, EK
    Krasnogor, N
    [J]. 2005 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 912 - 919
  • [9] Genetic programming based symbolic regression for shear capacity prediction of SFRC beams
    Ben Chaabene, Wassim
    Nehdi, Moncef L.
    [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 280
  • [10] Customized prediction of attendance to soccer matches based on symbolic regression and genetic programming
    Yamashita, Gabrielli H.
    Fogliatto, Flavio S.
    Anzanello, Michel J.
    Tortorella, Guilherme L.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 187