Hillslope and stream connectivity: simulation of concentration-discharge patterns using the HYDRUS model

被引:0
|
作者
Smethurst, P. J. [1 ]
Langergraber, G. [1 ]
Petrone, K. C. [1 ]
Holz, G. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Water quality; nitrate; soil; runoff; overland flow; seepage; drainage; PHOSPHORUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Nutrient concentrations and loads in streamflow are sensitive to rapidly changing stream chemistry and discharge during storms. Mechanistic models that can simulate water and solute movement at hillslope scales could be useful for predicting concentration-discharge (C-Q) patterns and thereby improve our quantitative understanding of terrestrial-aquatic linkages for targeted catchment management. Our objective was to use the HYDRUS model to represent hydro-biogeochemical processes in soils that drive seepage of water and solutes from soil profiles into streams. Specifically we compared measurements in the literature with HYDRUS outputs using two methods for simulating runoff. This model predicts runoff (R) as rainfall that is instantaneously in excess of infiltration, but it is not designed to route runoff as overland flow. Post-HYDRUS addition of seepage to runoff was used to simulate the delivery of dissolved or particulate constituents to a stream (method A). Alternatively, we demonstrated how simulations using HYDRUS could include a hypothetical layer at the top of the soil profile with extremely high porosity and hydraulic conductivity that enabled overland flow and down-slope infiltration, but in this case only dissolved constituents could be considered (method B). These methods were evaluated by comparing the simulated temporal patterns of discharge and concentration with observed patterns. The catchments considered were in Slovenia (4210 ha) and in Australia (11.9 ha). Methods A and B were shown to adequately simulate some aspects of published discharge-concentration patterns, e. g. runoff dilution or concentration effects, but the temporal patterns of discharge for both methods did not precisely match those measured at small time-steps (e. g. 15 minutes). This limitation was due mainly to inadequate simulation of the down-slope movement of runoff and down-slope infiltration of a portion of this runoff. Method A was generally more useful than method B. Despite this limitation, both methods, if used carefully, should be adequate for many purposes, especially when simulating longer time-steps. Additional hypothetical simulations illustrated the significance of soil hydraulic conductivity, soil water content, and vertical gradients in solute concentrations in soil. Two temporal types of discharge-concentration patterns were observed; short-term hysteresis caused by runoff during and shortly after a rainfall event, and longer-term trends associated with infiltration and seepage. Clockwise and anti-clockwise hysteresis was demonstrated to be potentially due to the temporal asynchrony of peak discharge and peak concentration in runoff. Simulations also demonstrated advantages over using the more common approach of a 2- or 3-component mixing model. Our results suggest that the HYDRUS model will be useful for the mechanistic simulation of within-soil processes that are needed to predict discharge-concentration patterns at hillslope scales.
引用
收藏
页码:4057 / 4063
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Consistency of patterns in concentration-discharge plots
    Chanat, JG
    Rice, KC
    Hornberger, GM
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (08)
  • [2] A low-dimensional model for concentration-discharge dynamics in groundwater stream systems
    Duffy, CJ
    Cusumano, J
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (09) : 2235 - 2247
  • [3] Hydrologic connectivity and source heterogeneity control concentration-discharge relationships
    Knapp, Julia L. A.
    Li, Li
    Musolff, Andreas
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2022, 36 (09)
  • [4] Dynamics of nitrate concentration-discharge patterns in an urban watershed
    Duncan, Jonathan M.
    Welty, Claire
    Kemper, John T.
    Groffman, Peter M.
    Band, Lawrence E.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (08) : 7349 - 7365
  • [5] Controls on solute concentration-discharge relationships revealed by simultaneous hydrochemistry observations of hillslope runoff and stream flow: The importance of critical zone structure
    Kim, Hyojin
    Dietrich, William E.
    Thurnhoffer, Benjamin M.
    Bishop, Jim K. B.
    Fung, Inez Y.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (02) : 1424 - 1443
  • [6] Hyporheic zone influences on concentration-discharge relationships in a headwater sandstone stream
    Hoagland, Beth
    Russo, Tess A.
    Gu, Xin
    Hill, Lillian
    Kaye, Jason
    Forsythe, Brandon
    Brantley, Susan L.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (06) : 4643 - 4667
  • [7] Concentration-discharge patterns in a small urban headwater stream in a seasonally dry water-limited tropical environment
    Gwenzi, Willis
    Chinyama, Shyleen R.
    Togarepi, Sydney
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 550 : 12 - 25
  • [8] Concentration-Discharge Patterns Across the Gulf of Alaska Reveal Geomorphological and Glacierization Controls on Stream Water Solute Generation and Export
    Jenckes, Jordan
    Ibarra, Daniel E.
    Munk, Lee Ann
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (01)
  • [9] Distinct Source Water Chemistry Shapes Contrasting Concentration-Discharge Patterns
    Zhi, Wei
    Li, Li
    Dong, Wenming
    Brown, Wendy
    Kaye, Jason
    Steefel, Carl
    Williams, Kenneth H.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (05) : 4233 - 4251
  • [10] Intra-event concentration-discharge relationships affected by hydrological connectivity in a karst catchment
    Hao, Liu
    Zhang, Zhicai
    Chen, Xi
    Cheng, Qinbo
    Li, Siliang
    Yue, Fujun
    Peng, Tao
    Zhang, Lin
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2023, 37 (04)