Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas

被引:9
|
作者
Diller, Martin [1 ]
Wallner, Johannes Peter [1 ]
Woltran, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Informat Syst, Vienna, Austria
来源
关键词
Abstract dialectical frameworks; systems; quantified Boolean formulas; ACCEPTABILITY; ARGUMENTS;
D O I
10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-241
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) constitute a recent and powerful generalization of Dung's argumentation frameworks (AFs), where the relationship between the arguments is specified via Boolean formulas. Recent results have shown that this enhancement comes with the price of higher complexity compared to AFs. In fact, acceptance problems in the world of ADFs can be hard even for the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. In order to implement reasoning problems on ADFs, systems for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) thus are suitable engines to be employed. In this paper we present QBF encodings on ADF problems generalizing recent work on QBFs for AF labellings. Our encodings not only provide a uniform and modular way of translating reasoning in ADFs to QBFs, but also build the basis for a novel system. We present a prototype implementation for the admissible and preferred semantics and evaluate its performance in comparison with another state-of-the-art tool for ADFs.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reasoning in abstract dialectical frameworks using quantified Boolean formulas
    Diller, Martin
    Wallner, Johannes Peter
    Woltran, Stefan
    [J]. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 2015, 6 (02) : 149 - 177
  • [2] Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas
    Egly, Uwe
    Woltran, Stefan
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2006, 144 : 133 - 144
  • [3] Solving advanced reasoning tasks using quantified Boolean formulas
    Egly, U
    Eiter, T
    Tompits, H
    Woltran, S
    [J]. SEVENTEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AAAI-2001) / TWELFTH INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (IAAI-2000), 2000, : 417 - 422
  • [4] Abstract Dialectical Frameworks for Legal Reasoning
    Al-Abdulkarim, Latifa
    Atkinson, Katie
    Bench-Capon, Trevor
    [J]. LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 271 : 61 - 70
  • [5] Abstract Solvers for Quantified Boolean Formulas and their Applications
    Brochenin, Remi
    Maratea, Marco
    [J]. AI*IA 2015: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 9336 : 205 - 217
  • [6] A Structural Approach to Reasoning with Quantified Boolean Formulas
    Pulina, Luca
    Tacchella, Armando
    [J]. 21ST INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-09), PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 596 - 602
  • [7] Propositional PSPACE reasoning with boolean programs versus quantified Boolean formulas
    Skelley, A
    [J]. AUTOMATA , LANGUAGES AND PROGRAMMING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3142 : 1163 - 1175
  • [8] Learning to Integrate Deduction and Search in Reasoning about Quantified Boolean Formulas
    Pulina, Luca
    Tacchella, Armando
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF COMBINING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5749 : 350 - 365
  • [9] On models for quantified Boolean formulas
    Büning, HK
    Zhao, XS
    [J]. LOGIC VERSUS APPROXIMATION: ESSAYS DEDICATED TO MICHAEL M RICHTER ON THE OCCASION OF HIS 65TH BIRTHDAY, 2004, 3075 : 18 - 32
  • [10] Symmetries of Quantified Boolean Formulas
    Kauers, Manuel
    Seidl, Martina
    [J]. THEORY AND APPLICATIONS OF SATISFIABILITY TESTING - SAT 2018, 2018, 10929 : 199 - 216