Suture Complication Rates and Surgical Outcomes According to the Nonabsorbable Suture Materials Used in Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Polyester versus Polypropylene

被引:5
|
作者
Lee, Jeesun [1 ]
Oh, Sumin [1 ]
Jeon, Myung Jae [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
关键词
Apical vaginal prolapse; Apical suspension; Granulation tissue; Suture erosion; Suture-related complication; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; STANDARDIZATION; POLYDIOXANONE; TERMINOLOGY; MESH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To evaluate suture complication rates and surgical outcomes according to the nonabsorbable suture materials used in vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) surgery. Multifilament polyester (polyethylene terephthalate [PET]) and monofilament polypropylene (PP) sutures were compared. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single teaching hospital. Patients: Total of 229 patients who underwent transvaginal USLS and completed a 1-year follow-up. Interventions: Use of PET and PP sutures for transvaginal USLS procedures. Measurements and Main Results: PP sutures were used in 149 patients, and PET sutures were used in 80 patients. The suture-related complication rates, including granulation tissue and suture erosion at the vaginal apex, were significantly higher in the PET suture group than in the PP suture group (46.3% vs 20.1%, p <. 01). However, there was no significant difference in the rates of surgical failure (defined as the presence of vaginal bulging symptoms, apical descent >= half of the total vaginal length, anterior or posterior vaginal wall descent beyond the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse) between the 2 groups (p=.84). Conclusion: Compared with the use of multifilament PET sutures, the use of monofilament PP sutures in transvaginal USLS may reduce suture-related complications without increasing surgical failure rates. (C) 2020 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1503 / 1507
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse
    Chill, Henry H.
    Cohen-Milun, Gila
    Cohen, Adiel
    Moss, Nani P.
    Winer, Joel D.
    Shveiky, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (06) : 784 - 790
  • [2] Suture erosion rates and long-term surgical outcomes in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament suspension with braided polyester suture
    Toglia, Marc R.
    Fagan, Matthew J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 198 (05) : 600.e1 - 600.e4
  • [3] Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture
    Micheline J. Wong
    Azadeh Rezvan
    Narender N. Bhatia
    Tajnoos Yazdany
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2011, 22 : 1389 - 1394
  • [4] Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture
    Wong, Micheline J.
    Rezvan, Azadeh
    Bhatia, Narender N.
    Yazdany, Tajnoos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (11) : 1389 - 1394
  • [5] Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups
    Bradley, Megan S.
    Bickhaus, Jennifer A.
    Amundsen, Cindy L.
    Newcomb, Laura K.
    Truong, Tracy
    Weidner, Alison C.
    Siddiqui, Nazema Y.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (03): : 207 - 212
  • [6] Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture
    Christopher P. Chung
    Richard Miskimins
    Thomas J. Kuehl
    Paul M. Yandell
    Bobby L. Shull
    [J]. International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 223 - 227
  • [7] Permanent suture used in uterosacral ligament suspension offers better anatomical support than delayed absorbable suture
    Chung, Christopher P.
    Miskimins, Richard
    Kuehl, Thomas J.
    Yandell, Paul M.
    Shull, Bobby L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (02) : 223 - 227
  • [8] Absorbable vs. Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse
    Chill, H.
    Cohen-Milun, G.
    Cohen, A.
    Moss, N.
    Winer, J.
    Shveiky, D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 2) : S402 - S404
  • [9] High uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: comparison of absorbable vs. permanent suture for apical fixation
    Kasturi, Seshadri
    Bentley-Taylor, Miriam
    Woodman, Patrick J.
    Terry, Colin L.
    Hale, Douglass S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (07) : 941 - 945
  • [10] ANATOMIC AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE OUTCOMES OF POLYPROPYLENE (PROLIFT) MESH VERSUS UTEROSACRAL LIGAMENT SUSPENSION FOR VAGINAL PROLAPSE REPAIR
    Kudish, B.
    Iglesia, C. B.
    Melcher, L.
    Sokol, A. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 : S203 - S204