Potential therapeutic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Omura, Minami [1 ]
Kikuchi, Eiji [2 ]
Shigeta, Keisuke [1 ]
Ogihara, Koichiro [1 ]
Hakozaki, Kyohei [3 ]
Hara, Satoshi [4 ]
Shirotake, Suguru [5 ]
Ide, Hiroki [6 ]
Yoshimine, Shunsuke [7 ]
Ohigashi, Takashi [8 ]
Mizuno, Ryuichi [1 ]
Oya, Mototsugu [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] St Marianna Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Hosp, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[4] Kawasaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Urol, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
[5] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Urooncol, Int Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[6] Saiseikai Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Saitama City Hosp, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[8] Int Univ Hlth & Welf Mita Hosp, Dept Urol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
muscle-invasive bladder cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; adjuvant chemotherapy; therapeutic advantage; cancer-specific survival; RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyab210
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with improved prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the therapeutic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unknown in real-world settings. Therefore, we herein evaluated the clinical outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in pT3/4 muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. Materials and Methods Among 587 bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy, 200 with a pathological T3 or higher muscle-invasive bladder cancer were included in the present analysis. Recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival were assessed by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results Median age was 73 years, and the median follow-up duration was 17 months. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 53.6% in 66 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which was significantly higher than that in those without adjuvant chemotherapy (34.0%, P = 0.025). The absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 2.114, P = 0.004) and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio = 2.203, P = 0.011) was identified as independent prognostic indicators for cancer-specific death. In patients treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 143), the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio:1.887, P = 0.030) remained an independent indicator for cancer-specific death. For those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, three or more adjuvant chemotherapy cycles were independently associated with favourable outcome (hazard ratio = 0.240, P = 0.009). In contrast, for neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients (N = 57), adjuvant chemotherapy was not independently associated with disease recurrence or cancer-specific death. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improvements in the prognosis of patients, even in those with pT3 or higher muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although three or more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were effective for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, no therapeutic advantages were observed with additional adjuvant chemotherapy in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our retrospective real-world database analysis on locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients displayed improved prognosis with adjuvant chemotherapy delivery only in chemo-naive settings.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 396
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Calabro, Fabio
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (02) : 348 - 358
  • [2] Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Clark, Peter E.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (06) : 821 - 830
  • [3] Comparison of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Fam, Mina M.
    Yabes, Jonathan G.
    Hale, Nathan E.
    Turner, Robert M., II
    Lopa, Samia H.
    Gingrich, Jeffrey R.
    Borza, Tudor
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Davies, Benjamin J.
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2020, 18 (03) : 201 - +
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVERSE PATHOLOGY AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Parker, William
    Habermann, Elizabeth
    Day, Courtney
    Zaid, Harras
    Frank, Igor
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Tollefson, Matthew
    Boorjian, Stephen
    Pagliaro, Lance
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E432 - E432
  • [5] A Systematic Review of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bochner, Bernard H.
    Clarke, Noel W.
    Daneshmand, Siamak
    Galsky, Matthew D.
    Hahn, Noah M.
    Lerner, Seth P.
    Mason, Malcolm
    Powles, Thomas
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    Sonpavde, Guru
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 523 - 533
  • [6] Review of Current Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
    Houede, Nadine
    Pourquier, Philippe
    Beuzebo, Philippe
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (03) : E20 - E25
  • [7] Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on therapeutic management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Meyer, V.
    Flechon, A.
    Tartas, S.
    Fassi-Fehri, H.
    Ruffion, A.
    Martin, X.
    Colombel, M.
    [J]. PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2015, 25 (02): : 83 - 89
  • [8] Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer
    Sternberg, CN
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1996, 23 (05) : 621 - 632
  • [9] Integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and cystectomy in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Milowsky, Matthew I.
    Stadler, Walter M.
    Bajorin, Dean F.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 102 (09) : 1339 - 1344
  • [10] Re: A Systematic Review of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
    Sagalowsky, Arthur I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (03) : 579 - 580