Understanding decision making about major surgery: protocol for a qualitative study of shared decision making by high-risk patients and their clinical teams

被引:11
|
作者
Shaw, Sara [1 ]
Hughes, Gemma [1 ]
Stephens, Tim [2 ]
Pearse, Rupert [3 ]
Prowle, John [3 ]
Ashcroft, Richard Edmund [4 ]
Avagliano, Ester [5 ]
Day, James [6 ]
Edsell, Mark [5 ]
Edwards, Jennifer [7 ]
Everest, Leslie [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[3] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts & London Sch Med & Dent, London, England
[4] City Univ London, Sch Law, London, England
[5] St Georges Univ Hosp Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, London, England
[6] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Oxford, England
[7] Royal Alexandra Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[8] Patient Representat, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
adult surgery; communication; high risk; qualitative research; shared decision making;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Surgical treatments are being offered to more patients than ever before, and increasingly to high-risk patients (typically multimorbid and over 75). Shared decision making is seen as essential practice. However, little is currently known about what 'good' shared decision making involves nor how it applies in the context of surgery for high-risk patients. This new study aims to identify how high-risk patients, their families and clinical teams negotiate decision making for major surgery. Methods and analysis Focusing on major joint replacement, colorectal and cardiac surgery, we use qualitative methods to explore how patients, their families and clinicians negotiate decision making (including interactional, communicative and informational aspects and the extent to which these are perceived as shared) and reflect back on the decisions they made. Phase 1 involves video recording 15 decision making encounters about major surgery between patients, their carers/families and clinicians; followed by up to 90 interviews (with the same patient, carer and clinician participants) immediately after a decision has been made and again 3-6 months later. Phase 2 involves focus groups with a wider group of (up to 90) patients and (up to 30) clinicians to test out emerging findings and inform development of shared decision making scenarios (3-5 summary descriptions of how decisions are made). Ethics and dissemination The study forms the first part in a 6-year programme of research, Optimising Shared decision-making for high-Risk major Surgery (OSIRIS). Ethical challenges around involving patients at a challenging time in their lives will be overseen by the programme steering committee, which includes strong patient representation and a lay chair. In addition to academic outputs, we will produce a typology of decision making scenarios for major surgery to feed back to patients, professionals and service providers and inform subsequent work in the OSIRIS programme.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery with high-risk patients: a multi-method qualitative study
    Shaw, Sara E.
    Hughes, Gemma
    Pearse, Rupert
    Avagliano, Ester
    Day, James R.
    Edsell, Mark E.
    Edwards, Jennifer A.
    Everest, Leslie
    Stephens, Timothy J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [2] Shared decision making for high-risk surgery
    Barnett, G.
    Swart, M.
    [J]. BJA EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (08) : 300 - 306
  • [3] Annals Clinical Decision Making: Communicating Risk and Engaging Patients in Shared Decision Making
    Armstrong, Katrina A.
    Metlay, Joshua P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 172 (10) : 688 - +
  • [4] Clinical context and communication in shared decision-making about major surgery: Findings from a qualitative study with colorectal, orthopaedic and cardiac patients
    Hughes, Gemma
    Stephens, Timothy J.
    Seuren, Lucas M.
    Pearse, Rupert M.
    Shaw, Sara E.
    [J]. HEALTH, 2024,
  • [5] Clinical decision making in a high-risk primary care environment: a qualitative study in the UK
    Balla, John
    Heneghan, Carl
    Thompson, Matthew
    Balla, Margaret
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (01):
  • [6] MEASURING SHARED DECISION MAKING: UNDERSTANDING SHARED DECISION MAKING ACROSS CLINICAL CONDITIONS AND TOPICS
    Vo, Ha
    Valentine, K. D.
    Brodney, Suzanne
    Fowler, Floyd
    Barry, Michael
    Sepucha, Karen
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E18 - E19
  • [7] Opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery with high-risk patients: the switch from 'fixing the problem' to undertaking shared decision-making. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: 56-66
    Connal, Stuart
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (05) : E152 - E153
  • [8] Understanding the complexities of shared decision-making in cancer: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients undergoing colorectal surgery
    Hirpara, Dhruvin H.
    Cleghorn, Michelle C.
    Sockalingam, Sanjeev
    Quereshy, Fayez A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 59 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [9] Opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery with high-risk patients: the switch from 'fixing the problem' to undertaking shared decision-making. Response to Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: e152-3
    Hughes, Gemma
    Shaw, Sara E.
    Pearse, Rupert M.
    Stephens, Timothy J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (02) : 423 - 423
  • [10] Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study
    Fen-Fang Chung
    Pao-Yu Wang
    Shu-Chuan Lin
    Yu-Hsia Lee
    Hon-Yen Wu
    Mei-Hsiang Lin
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 20