Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: Predictors of deferred intervention and treatment choice

被引:10
|
作者
Sayyid, Rashid K. [1 ]
Klotz, Laurence [2 ]
Benton, John Z. [3 ]
Ma, Merry [1 ]
Woodruff, Phillip [1 ]
Satkunasivam, Raj [4 ,5 ]
Terris, Martha K. [1 ,6 ]
Wallis, Christopher J. D. [7 ]
Klaassen, Zachary [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Dept Surg, Sect Urol, Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA USA
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[4] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Houston Methodist Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Georgia Canc Ctr, Augusta, GA USA
[7] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
DISTRUST; OUTCOMES; CARE;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.7272
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active surveillance (AS) is increasingly used for favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to determine oncological and sociodemographic predictors of deferred definitive therapy and decision for radical prostatectomy (RP) vs. radiotherapy (RT). Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify all FIR PCa diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 opting for AS for at least one year following diagnosis. We sought to determine predictors of treatment and treatment type using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 20 334 patients were identified. An annual decrease in incident FIR patients managed initially with AS between 2010 (4061) and 2015 (2947) was noted (p for trend <0.001); 17 895 (88.0%) patients underwent deferred RP and/or RT. Patients with higher baseline cancer volume and clinical stage were significantly more likely to discontinue AS. Patients of higher socioeconomic status were more likely to undergo deferred therapy, with increased odds for RT over RP. African American patients had lower odds of undergoing definitive intervention (odds ratio 0.83, p=0.030) and were significantly more likely to opt for XRT. Oncological characteristics leading to FIR classification influenced treatment choice at the time of deferred intervention: RT was treatment of choice in 86.3% and 86.0% of Gleason group 2 and prostate-specific antigen 10-20 FIR patients, respectively; 96.1% of treated cT2b-c FIR patients opted for RP. Conclusions: Most FIR PCa patients initially managed with AS eventually undergo deferred definitive therapy, with choice of treat ment significantly influenced by patients' baseline oncological and sociodemographic characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:E7 / E14
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE IN FAVORABLE INTERMEDIATE RISK PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS: PREDICTORS OF DEFERRED INTERVENTION AND TREATMENT CHOICE
    Sayyid, Rashid
    Klotz, Laurence
    Benton, John
    Ma, Merry
    Woodruff, Phillip
    Satkunasivam, Raj
    Terris, Martha
    Wallis, Christopher
    Klaassen, Zachary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E289 - E290
  • [2] Are men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance?
    Raldow, Ann Caroline
    Zhang, Danjie
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Braccioforte, Michelle H.
    Moran, Brian Joseph
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [3] Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance
    Sherer, Michael, V
    Leonard, Austin J.
    Nelson, Tyler J.
    Guram, Kripa
    De Moraes, Gustavo Rodrigues
    Javier-Desloges, Juan
    Kane, Christopher
    McKay, Rana R.
    Rose, Brent S.
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 50 : 61 - 67
  • [4] Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 125 (03) : 346 - 354
  • [5] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    M A Dall'Era
    L Klotz
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2017, 20 : 1 - 6
  • [6] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Dall'Era, M. A.
    Klotz, L.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [7] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Nayan, Madhur
    Carvalho, Filipe L. F.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [8] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Madhur Nayan
    Filipe L. F. Carvalho
    Adam S. Feldman
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 79 - 86
  • [9] Is active surveillance safe for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer?
    Chung, Hoseok
    Shin, Bo Sung
    Nam, Deok-Hyun
    Chung, Hoseok
    Kim, Myung Ki
    Jung, Seung Il
    Kang, Taek Won
    Kwon, Dong Deuk
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 4 - 4
  • [10] Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience
    Bandelier, Q.
    Bastide, C.
    Charvet, A. -L
    Leclercq, L.
    Gondran-Tellier, B.
    Campagna, J.
    Long-Depaquit, T.
    Daniel, L.
    Rossi, D.
    Lechevallier, E.
    Baboudjian, M.
    [J]. FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (01):