Sugar Content of Popular Sweetened Beverages Based on Objective Laboratory Analysis: Focus on Fructose Content

被引:190
|
作者
Ventura, Emily E. [1 ]
Davis, Jaimie N. [1 ]
Goran, Michael I. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION; CORN SYRUP; METABOLIC SYNDROME; DIETARY FRUCTOSE; WEIGHT-GAIN; DISEASE; OBESITY; WOMEN; RISK; GLUCOSE;
D O I
10.1038/oby.2010.255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The consumption of fructose, largely in the form of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), has risen over the past several decades and is thought to contribute negatively to metabolic health. However, the fructose content of foods and beverages produced with HFCS is not disclosed and estimates of fructose content are based on the common assumption that the HFCS used contains 55% fructose. The objective of this study was to conduct an objective laboratory analysis of the sugar content and composition in popular sugar-sweetened beverages with a particular focus on fructose content. Twenty-three sugar-sweetened beverages along with four standard solutions were analyzed for sugar profiles using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in an independent, certified laboratory. Total sugar content was calculated as well as percent fructose in the beverages that use HFCS as the sole source of fructose. Results showed that the total sugar content of the beverages ranged from 85 to 128% of what was listed on the food label. The mean fructose content in the HFCS used was 59% (range 47-65%) and several major brands appear to be produced with HFCS that is 65% fructose. Finally, the sugar profile analyses detected forms of sugar that were inconsistent with what was listed on the food labels. This analysis revealed significant deviations in sugar amount and composition relative to disclosures from producers. In addition, the tendency for use of HFCS that is higher in fructose could be contributing to higher fructose consumption than would otherwise be assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 874
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response to "Sugar Content of Popular Sweetened Beverages Based on Objective Laboratory Analysis: Focus on Fructose Content"
    Hobbs, Larry J.
    Krueger, Dana
    OBESITY, 2011, 19 (04) : 687 - 687
  • [2] Response to "Response to the Letter Regarding 'Sugar Content of Popular Sweetened Beverages'"
    Hobbs, Larry J.
    Krueger, Dana
    OBESITY, 2011, 19 (04) : 688 - 688
  • [3] Sugar Content and Warning Criteria Evaluation for Popular Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Taipei, Taiwan
    Yen, Chieh
    Huang, Ya-Li
    Chung, Mei
    Chen, Yi-Chun
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [4] Free sugar content in sugar-sweetened beverages in Slovenia
    Zupanic, N.
    Pravst, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 176 - 177
  • [5] A Content Analysis of Online Messages about Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
    Li, Yingke
    Shen, Lijiang
    Dillard, James Price
    Li, Shu
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] Online commentaries of the sugar-sweetened beverages tax in Malaysia: Content analysis
    Mohd Hanim, Muhammad Faiz Bin
    Sabri, Budi Aslinie Md
    Yusof, Norashikin
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 41 (01) : 139 - 150
  • [7] Focus on sugar-sweetened beverages
    Caballero, Benjamin
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2015, 18 (07) : 1143 - 1144
  • [8] Concrete images of the sugar content in sugar-sweetened beverages reduces attraction to and selection of these beverages
    Adams, John Milton
    Hart, William
    Gilmer, Declan O.
    Lloyd-Richardson, Elizabeth E.
    Burton, K. Alex
    APPETITE, 2014, 83 : 10 - 18
  • [9] Fructose content and composition of commercial HFCS-sweetened carbonated beverages
    J S White
    L J Hobbs
    S Fernandez
    International Journal of Obesity, 2015, 39 : 176 - 182
  • [10] Fructose content and composition of commercial HFCS-sweetened carbonated beverages
    White, J. S.
    Hobbs, L. J.
    Fernandez, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2015, 39 (01) : 176 - 182