Alcohol-Related Brief Interventions as a Criterion for American College of Surgeons Level I Trauma Center Verification: How Best to Train the Interventionists?

被引:10
|
作者
London, Jason A. [1 ,2 ]
Dunn, Christopher W. [3 ]
Utter, Garth H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Surg, S Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif, Dept Surg, Davis Med Ctr, Sacramento, CA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Alcohol; Brief intervention; Motivational interview; Traumatic injury; Injury; Prevention; Training; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DRINKING; INJURY; NURSE; RISK; ASSOCIATION; ADDICTION; DRINKERS; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e3182127b0b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recently required that Level I trauma centers have the capability to perform counseling in the form of brief interventions (BIs) for injured patients identified as problem drinkers. However, it is not yet known what type of training is optimal for trauma center personnel who will conduct these BIs. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, a Level I trauma center. We compared two methods of training trauma nurse practitioners (NPs) without prior counseling expertise to conduct BIs: formal workshop training versus "on-the-job" (OTJ) training. throughout the text. Is this OK? -- We also evaluated whether a further "booster" training session would improve BI skills. We assessed BI skills in blinded fashion during interviews with a standardized patient actor using a 21-point checklist of BI counseling tasks ("FLO" score). Results: Nine workshop-and five OTJ-trained NPs participated. FLO scores did not markedly differ between the two groups after initial training (total FLO score, 9.6 +/- 2.4 and 7.8 +/- 0.4, workshop vs. OTJ, respectively; 95% confidence interval of difference, -4.1 to 0.6). FLO scores did however improve in both groups after booster training (9.1 +/- 2.0 and 16.0 +/- 2.2, time 1 vs. time 2, respectively; 95% confidence interval of difference, 4.7-9.1). The magnitude of improvement in FLO scores after the booster session did not differ between the workshop and OTJ groups. Conclusions: In preparing NPs to conduct BIs, OTJ training by an experienced peer does not seem to differ markedly from workshop training by expert counselors. Interventionist knowledge and performance can be improved in the short term by follow-up training. This indicates that NP's taught by either method should undergo periodic continuing education to maintain the necessary skill set for performing BIs.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Geriatric Trauma, Frailty, and American College of Surgeons Trauma Center Verification Level: Are There Any Correlations with Outcomes?
    El-Qawaqzeh, Khaled
    Reina Limon, Raul F. A.
    Hosseinpour, Hamidreza
    Ditillo, Michael F.
    Obaid, Omar
    Anand, Tanya
    Stewart, Collin
    Nelson, Adam C.
    Nguyen, Lucia
    Joseph, Bellal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 235 (05) : S281 - S281
  • [2] The impact of level of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma verification and state designation status on trauma center outcomes
    Elkbuli, Adel
    Dowd, Brianna
    Flores, Rudy
    Boneva, Dessy
    McKenney, Mark
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (25) : e16133
  • [3] Early impact of American College of Surgeons-verification at a level-1 pediatric trauma center
    Choi, Pamela M.
    Hong, Charles
    Woods, Steve
    Warner, Brad W.
    Keller, Martin S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2016, 51 (06) : 1026 - 1029
  • [4] A LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS OF ALCOHOL-RELATED VIOLENCE AND RISK BEHAVIORS AMONG RECIPIENTS OF A BRIEF INTERVNETION IN A LEVEL I TRAUMA CENTER
    Cochran, G. T.
    Field, C. A.
    Caetano, R.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 35 (06) : 145A - 145A
  • [5] American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma verification level affects trauma center management of pelvic ring injuries and patient mortality
    Oliphant, Bryant W.
    Tignanelli, Christopher J.
    Napolitano, Lena M.
    Goulet, James A.
    Hemmila, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2019, 86 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [6] Impact of Compliance with the American College of Surgeons Trauma Center Verification Requirements on Organ Donation-Related Outcomes
    Malinoski, Darren J.
    Patel, Madhukar S.
    Lush, Stephanie
    Willis, M. Lynn
    Navarro, Sonia
    Schulman, Danielle
    Querantes, Tasha
    Leinen-Duren, Ramona
    Salim, Ali
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (02) : 186 - 192
  • [7] American College of Surgeons trauma center verification versus state designation: Are Level II centers slipping through the cracks?
    Brown, Joshua B.
    Watson, Gregory A.
    Forsythe, Raquel M.
    Alarcon, Louis H.
    Bauza, Graciela
    Murdock, Alan D.
    Billiar, Timothy R.
    Peitzman, Andrew B.
    Sperry, Jason L.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 75 (01): : 44 - 49
  • [8] American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Verification Level II Vs Level I Outcomes: Similar but Without all the Hype
    Plurad, David
    Chawla-Kondal, Bhani
    Sheets, Nicholas
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (09) : 2414 - 2415
  • [9] Characteristics of ACS-verified Level I and Level II trauma centers: A study linking trauma center verification review data and the National Trauma Data Bank of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
    Shafi, Shahid
    Barnes, Sunni
    Ahn, Chul
    Hemilla, Mark R.
    Cryer, H. Gill
    Nathens, Avery
    Neal, Melanie
    Fildes, John
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 81 (04): : 735 - 742
  • [10] AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS NEW LEVEL I CHILDREN'S SURGERY CENTER VERIFICATION IMPROVES EFFICIENCY IN TREATING ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH FEMUR FRACTURES
    White, C.
    Leshikar, H. B.
    Haus, B.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (01) : 294 - 295