Understanding conflict in transport mega-projects: social impacts and power dynamics in the WestConnex project, Sydney

被引:7
|
作者
Hossain, Syeda Rafsana [1 ]
Fuller, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Geog & Planning, Sydney, NSW 2019, Australia
关键词
Conflict; Social impacts; Power relationships; Australia; Infrastructure; Transport mega projects; MEGA-PROJECT; POLITICS; LICENSE; SIA;
D O I
10.1080/00049182.2021.1964162
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Conflicts around transport mega-projects, driven by social and environmental impacts, are increasingly prevalent around the world. While environmental impacts have received significant attention, less is known about how the intangible social impacts of these projects stimulate conflict. Assessment of these impacts is crucial; however, the process is often influenced by the underlying power relationships within neoliberal governance. This paper analyses the discursive context of state-community conflicts in transport mega-projects and explores how power dynamics shape the perceptions of both the intensity and extent of its social impacts. Drawing on a case study of the WestConnex project, a controversial motorway development in Sydney, the paper analyses government policy documents and online community submissions to explore the conflicts around the project. Through critical discourse analysis, the paper provides insights into the nature of power relationships that limit the scope of impact assessment and underpin conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 313
页数:21
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] A Framework for Understanding and Modeling Risk in Mega-Projects and Its Impact on the Markets for Project Finance
    Mukherjee, Atanu
    Chatterjee, Purnendu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURED FINANCE, 2015, 21 (03): : 88 - 105
  • [2] Reflecting on How Social Impacts are Considered in Transport Infrastructure Project Planning: Looking beyond the Claimed Success of Sydney's South West Rail Link
    Mottee, Lara K.
    Arts, Jos
    Vanclay, Frank
    Miller, Fiona
    Howitt, Richard
    [J]. URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (03) : 185 - 198