An Uncontrolled Trial of Flexibly Delivered Relationship Education With Low-Income, Unmarried Perinatal Couples

被引:4
|
作者
Heyman, Richard E. [1 ]
Baucom, Katherine J. W. [1 ,3 ]
Slep, Amy M. Smith [1 ]
Mitnick, Danielle M. [1 ]
Halford, W. Kim [2 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
couple relationship; intimate partner violence; parenting; prevention; socioeconomic status; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HEALTHY MARRIAGE INITIATIVES; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL HEALTH; SELF-REGULATION; SINGLE MOTHERS; TRANSITION; RISK; PARENTHOOD;
D O I
10.1111/fare.12431
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective To examine couple and parenting outcomes from an American version of Couple CARE for Parents (CCP) in low-income, unmarried couples. Background We adapted an evidence-based, flexibly delivered program for use with low-income, unmarried couples, for whom the outcome literature is scarce. Method Couples (N = 443) were recruited from maternity units and began CCP. They completed measures before, during, and immediately after the intervention and again 6 months later. Results Experience of moderate psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) declined and perceived parenting efficacy increased over time; there was no change in severe psychological or physical IPV. Individuals with lower levels of relationship commitment than their partners showed improvement in relationship satisfaction, whereas those with similar or higher levels of commitment maintained their baseline levels despite being in a period of expected satisfaction decline. Conclusion CCP showed some signs of helping low-income couples during a stressful period, and its flexible service delivery model allowed these couples to participate by reducing the impediments of transportation challenges, conflicting work schedules, and overall time poverty. Implications The results of this study suggest practitioners interested in using CCP with low-income couples would likely maximize the impact by (a) focusing on pregnant, first-time parents; (b) integrating CCP within postnatal health care; and (c) assuming that a considerable minority of couples will avail themselves of only up to two sessions, and thus practitioners should frontload content, making other content optional or just-in-time. In addition, nonpsychoeducational elements (e.g., gamification, easy computerized tasks to reduce angry responses, watching couple-themed movies) could enliven preventative offerings for perinatal couples.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 864
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting program retention in a flexibly-delivered relationship education program for low-income, unmarried parents
    Bulling, Lisanne J.
    Baucom, Katherine J. W.
    Heyman, Richard E.
    Slep, Amy M. Smith
    Mitnick, Danielle M.
    Lorber, Michael F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 23 (03) : 234 - 256
  • [2] Influence of Relationship Education on Relationship Satisfaction for Low-Income Couples
    Carlson, Ryan G.
    Barden, Sejal M.
    Daire, Andrew P.
    Greene, Jennifer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 92 (04): : 418 - 427
  • [3] Effects of online relationship programs for low-income couples during the perinatal period
    Mitchell, Erica A.
    Le, Yunying
    Hatch, S. Gabe
    Guttman, Shayna
    Doss, Brian D.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2023, 167
  • [4] Effects of Relationship Education on Couple Communication and Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Low-Income Couples
    Williamson, Hannah C.
    Altman, Noemi
    Hsueh, JoAnn
    Bradbury, Thomas N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 84 (02) : 156 - 166
  • [5] Relationship Education Experiences of Couple Improvement and Group Dynamics in Relationship Education With Low-Income Couples
    Wheeler, Naomi J.
    Harris, Shaywanna
    Young, Mark E.
    [J]. FAMILY JOURNAL, 2018, 26 (02): : 174 - 184
  • [6] Examining Passive and Active Recruitment Methods for Low-Income Couples in Relationship Education
    Carlson, Ryan G.
    Fripp, Jessica
    Munyon, Matthew D.
    Daire, Andrew
    Johnson, Jennifer M.
    Delorenzi, Leigh
    [J]. MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW, 2014, 50 (01): : 76 - 91
  • [7] Examining quality time as a mediator of dyadic change in a randomized controlled trial of relationship education for low-income couples
    Carlson, Ryan G.
    Barden, Sejal M.
    Locklear, Lauren
    Taylor, Dalena Dillman
    Carroll, Nakita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY, 2022, 48 (02) : 484 - 501
  • [8] The tempo of relationship progression among low-income couples
    Sassler, Sharon
    Addo, Fenaba
    Hartmann, Elizabeth
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2010, 39 (05) : 831 - 844
  • [9] Financial Arrangements and Relationship Quality in Low-Income Couples
    Addo, Fenaba R.
    Sassler, Sharon
    [J]. FAMILY RELATIONS, 2010, 59 (04) : 408 - 423
  • [10] Together but not "Together": Trajectories of relationship suspension for low-income unmarried parents
    Roy, Kevin M.
    Buckmiller, Nicolle
    McDowell, April
    [J]. FAMILY RELATIONS, 2008, 57 (02) : 198 - 210