Valuing elite sport success using the contingent valuation method: A transnational study

被引:13
|
作者
Funahashi, Hiroaki [1 ]
Shibli, Simon [2 ]
Sotiriadou, Popi [3 ]
Makinen, Jarmo [4 ]
Dijk, Bake [5 ]
De Bosscher, Veerle [6 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Griffith Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Res Inst Olymp Sports, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[5] Hanzehogesch Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Olympic success; monetary value; welfare economics; willingness to pay; international comparison; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ENVIRONMENTAL GOODS; SAMPLE SELECTION; POLICY; OLYMPICS; VALIDITY; GAMES; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.smr.2019.05.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study presents an application of the contingent valuation method for valuing medal winning success on a transnational basis to test whether more medals won equates to more utility. To achieve this aim, a research project was set up in five countries: Belgium, Finland, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked to state their willingness to pay to avoid a large-scale reduction in government funding for elite sport, resulting in a 50% reduction in medals won at the Tokyo 2020 Olympics. Results show that willingness to pay for avoiding reduced medal winning performance differs significantly between countries with the more successful countries reporting higher willingness to pay values than the relatively less successful countries. This finding indicates that more medals won appears to be linked with more utility. The validity tests on the regression models were generally consistent with the theoretical expectations. Implications are discussed in terms of how governments can promote elite sport development while being conscious of the public's acceptability of such investment. (C) 2019 Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:548 / 562
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method
    Novikova, Anastasija
    Rocchi, Lucia
    Vaznonis, Bernardas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [2] The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method
    Kristin M. Jakobsson
    Andrew K. Dragun
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2001, 19 : 211 - 227
  • [3] The worth of a possum: Valuing species with the contingent valuation method
    Jakobsson, KM
    Dragun, AK
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (03): : 211 - 227
  • [4] Valuing the benefits of mobile mammographic screening units using the contingent valuation method
    Clarke, PM
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (13) : 1647 - 1655
  • [5] Empirical Investigation of Sport Trademark Dilution Using Contingent Valuation Method
    Cho, Sungho
    Lee, J. Lucy
    Won, June
    Lee, Jong Kwan
    JOURNAL OF SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2020, 34 (03) : 189 - 200
  • [6] VALUING PUBLIC-GOODS WITH THE CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD - A CRITIQUE
    HARRISON, GW
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1992, 23 (03) : 248 - 257
  • [7] Valuing intangible costs of alcohol dependence: A contingent valuation study
    Jeanrenaud, Claude
    Pellegrini, Sonia
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2007, 117 (05): : 813 - 825
  • [8] Valuing a wind farm construction: A contingent valuation study in Greece
    Koundouri, Phoebe
    Kountouris, Yiannis
    Remoundou, Kyriaki
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) : 1939 - 1944
  • [9] Valuing Geospatial Information: Using the Contingent Valuation Method to Estimate the Economic Benefits of Landsat Satellite Imagery
    Loomis, John
    Koontz, Steve
    Miller, Holly
    Richardson, Leslie
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 81 (08): : 647 - 656
  • [10] The value of Olympic success and the intangible effects of sport events - a contingent valuation approach in Germany
    Wicker, Pamela
    Hallmann, Kirstin
    Breuer, Christoph
    Feiler, Svenja
    EUROPEAN SPORT MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY, 2012, 12 (04) : 337 - 355