Does technology gap increase FDI spillovers on productivity growth? Evidence from Chinese outward FDI in Belt and Road host countries

被引:108
|
作者
Razzaq, Asif [1 ]
An, Hui [1 ]
Delpachitra, Sarath [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Dalian, Peoples R China
关键词
Chinese outward foreign direct investment; Technology spillovers; Technology gap; Productivity growth; System GMM; Belt and Road Initiative; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; MONTE-CARLO; PANEL-DATA; POSITIVE SPILLOVERS; LOCAL-PARTICIPATION; DYNAMIC-MODELS; TFP GROWTH; DIFFUSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121050
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is driving the rapid growth of China's outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) across the BRI region. Many BRI host countries, which are developing or underdeveloped in nature, are embracing higher Chinese OFDI in the hope of improving their productivity, trade, and infrastructure. Unlike traditional models, which assumes that foreign investment stimulates productivity growth by generating technological diffusion from the developed world to the developing economies, it is argued that whether China, as a developing country, has sufficient technological capabilities to generate technological spillovers for developing BRI host countries, and what is the role of technology gap to catch up these spillovers. In doing so, this study examines the impact of Chinese OFDI-induced technology spillovers on total factor productivity growth conditional on technology gap between China and BRI host countries. This study employs System Generalized Method of Moments and Feasible Generalized Least Squares estimators and provides two key findings. First, Chinese OFDI increases the productivity growth of BRI host countries; however, the productivity spillovers are lower in magnitude across all specifications. Second, the productivity spillovers from Chinese OFDI decrease with the increase in technology gap, and after a certain threshold, these spillovers become less pronounced.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Determinants of Chinese Outward FDI in Countries Along "One Belt One Road"
    Liu, Hai Yue
    Tang, Ying Kai
    Chen, Xiao Lan
    Poznanska, Joanna
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2017, 53 (06) : 1374 - 1387
  • [2] Outward FDI Spillovers from Inward FDI: Evidence from Italian Firms
    Imbruno, Michele
    Kneller, Richard
    Pittiglio, Rosanna
    Reganati, Filippo
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 61 : 434 - 443
  • [4] Productivity Gap and Inward FDI Spillovers: Theory and Evidence from China
    Shen, Jim Huangnan
    Wang, Hao
    Lin, Steve Chu Chia
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2021, 29 (02) : 24 - 48
  • [5] Dynamics of outward FDI and productivity spillovers in logistics services industry: Evidence from China
    Ali, Usman
    Li, Yanxi
    Wang, Jian-Jun
    Yue, Xiaohang
    Chang, Ai-Chih
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2021, 148 (148)
  • [6] CHINESE MNES' OUTWARD FDI AND HOME COUNTRY PRODUCTIVITY: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF TECHNOLOGY GAP
    Li, Mei
    Li, Dan
    Lyles, Marjorie
    Liu, Shichang
    GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2016, 6 (04) : 289 - 308
  • [7] Reverse technological spillovers from outward FDI on home countries' total factor productivity: Does the mode of investment matter?
    Ashraf, Ayesha
    Carril-Caccia, Federico
    Doytch, Nadia
    BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2024, 24 (03) : 607 - 617
  • [8] Capital flows, FDI, and technology spillovers: Evidence from Arab countries
    Sadik, AT
    Bolbol, AA
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (12) : 2111 - 2125
  • [9] Host countries' growth opportunities and China's outward FDI
    Shen, Jun
    Li, Li
    ASIAN-PACIFIC ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2017, 31 (02) : 78 - 95
  • [10] China's outward FDI and environmental sustainability in belt and road countries: does the quality of institutions matter?
    Kamal, Muhammad Abdul
    Ullah, Assad
    Qureshi, Fiza
    Zheng, Jiajia
    Ahamd, Manzoor
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (05) : 1002 - 1036