Can periods of static loading be used to enhance the resistance of the spine to cumulative compression?

Results of in vitro studies conducted on isolated bone specimens have indicated a higher tolerance to static load than exists when exposed to cyclic loading, when controlled for creep rate. If this difference in load tolerance exists, it may be exploited to extend the life of vertebral bone exposed to repetitive compression, and potentially alter the development of spinal injury. However, little work has been conducted on functional spinal units to determine if bone displays this characteristic within an intact joint. Additionally, static loading may result in load redistribution within the intervertebral disc forcing more of the compressive load towards the periphery of the endplate away from the nucleus. In order to examine these potential mechanisms, 218 osteoligamentous porcine functional spinal units were assigned to one of 15 loading scenarios. This involved one of three normalized peak load magnitudes (50%, 70% and 90% of estimated compressive tolerance) and one of five normalized static load applications (0%, 50%, 100%, 200% and 1000% of the total dynamic work duration). Load magnitude significantly altered the resistance to cumulative compression with decreased peak magnitudes corresponding to both increased cumulative load tolerance and increased height loss. Static load periods did not alter the resistance of the spinal unit to cumulative compression or impact the number of cycles tolerated to failure. The insertion of static load periods impacted the total survival time to failure, but only for the 1000% static load group, an exposure unlikely to occur for most in vivo exposures. The insertion of static load periods decreased the amount of height loss during testing which may play a protective role by allowing load redistribution within the vertebral bone and intervertebral disc. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.