Adolescent Generation Z and sustainable and responsible fashion consumption: exploring the value-action gap

被引:10
|
作者
Williams, Annie [1 ]
Hodges, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Consumer Apparel & Retail Studies, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
来源
YOUNG CONSUMERS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
Value-action gap; Consumer behavior; Gen Z; Adolescen*; Apparel consumption; Socially responsible fashion consumption;
D O I
10.1108/YC-11-2021-1419
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore whether a "value-action gap" exists between what members of the adolescent Generation Z (Gen Z) cohort value and how they act by investigating their actions related to sustainable and responsible fashion consumption (SRFC). Specific focus was placed on understanding these actions across the apparel consumption cycle, ranging from the acquisition, to use and disposal stages. Design/methodology/approach Forty-one members of Gen Z (20 males and 21 females) ranging in age from 15 to 18 participated in a total of seven focus groups. Findings Three emergent themes were identified and used to structure the interpretation: unintentionally sustainable, a knowledge conundrum and perceived barriers. Research limitations/implications The majority of focus group participants were Caucasian, and all were teenagers from a single geographical area in the Southeastern USA. Findings provided by this study offer insight regarding the SRFC habits of Gen Z relative to their concerns regarding sustainability and social and environmental responsibility. Practical implications Findings offer practitioners an opportunity to better understand how to address the needs of this generational cohort as they progress through adulthood. Originality/value Findings of this study investigate the value-action gap to offer insight into how adolescent members of Gen Z make consumption decisions, and specifically within a framework of the apparel consumption cycle as a whole, including acquisition, use and disposal. Findings also reveal some of their more general views on SRFC.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 666
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the Value-Action Gap in Green Consumption: Roles of Risk Aversion, Subjective Knowledge, and Gender Differences
    Essiz, Oguzhan
    Yurteri, Sidar
    Mandrik, Carter
    Senyuz, Aysu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL MARKETING, 2023, 36 (01) : 67 - 92
  • [2] Environmental action in the home: Investigating the "value-action" gap
    Barr, S
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 91 : 43 - 54
  • [3] The 'value-action gap' in public attitudes towards sustainable energy: the case of hydrogen energy
    Flynn, Rob
    Bellaby, Paul
    Ricci, Miriam
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 57 : 159 - 180
  • [4] Exploring the Value-Action Gap through Shared Values, Capabilities and Deforestation Behaviours in Guatemala
    Robb, Jane
    Haggar, Jeremy
    Lamboll, Richard
    Castellanos, Edwin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 46 (03) : 226 - 233
  • [5] Student engagement with sustainability: understanding the value-action gap
    Chaplin, Gareth
    Wyton, Paul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 15 (04) : 404 - 417
  • [6] What shapes the “value-action” gap? The role of time perception reconsidered
    Chiara Franco
    Claudia Ghisetti
    [J]. Economia Politica, 2022, 39 : 1023 - 1053
  • [7] The value-action gap in waste recycling: The case of undergraduates in hong kong
    Chung, Shan-Shan
    Leung, Monica Miu-Yin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 40 (04) : 603 - 612
  • [8] The Value-Action Gap in Waste Recycling: The Case of Undergraduates in Hong Kong
    Shan-Shan Chung
    Monica Miu-Yin Leung
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2007, 40 : 603 - 612
  • [9] What shapes the "value-action" gap? The role of time perception reconsidered
    Franco, Chiara
    Ghisetti, Claudia
    [J]. ECONOMIA POLITICA, 2022, 39 (03) : 1023 - 1053
  • [10] Exploring attitude-behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products
    Park, Hyun Jung
    Lin, Li Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 117 : 623 - 628