PAX2 in endometrial carcinogenesis and in differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

被引:43
|
作者
Raffone, Antonio [1 ]
Travaglino, Antonio [2 ]
Saccone, Gabriele [1 ]
Mascolo, Massimo [2 ]
Insabato, Luigi [2 ]
Mollo, Antonio [1 ]
De Placido, Giuseppe [1 ]
Zullo, Fulvio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Sch Med, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Dent, Gynecol & Obstet Unit, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Sch Med, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Anat Pathol Unit, Naples, Italy
关键词
biomarker; cancer precursor; endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; endometrioid adenocarcinoma; paired box 2 protein; GENES; PROGRESSION; GROWTH; CANCER; MARKER; ROLES; PTEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13512
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction Benign and precancerous endometrial hyperplasias (EH) are differentiated according to two alternative histomorphologic classifications: World Health Organization (WHO) or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) system. The 2017 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology guidelines recommend paired box 2 protein (PAX2) immunohistochemistry to identify precancerous EH. However, methods for interpreting immunostaining and diagnostic accuracy are not defined, and the role of PAX2 in endometrial carcinogenesis is unclear. We aimed to assess: (a) PAX2 expression throughout endometrial carcinogenesis, from normal endometrium to benign EH, precancerous EH, and endometrial cancer (EC); (b) the diagnostic accuracy of PAX2 immunohistochemistry in diagnosing precancerous EH, defining criteria for its use. Material and methods Electronic databases were searched for from their inception to July 2018. All studies evaluating PAX2 immunohistochemistry in normal endometrium, EH, and EC were included. Univariate comparisons of PAX2 expression were performed with Fisher's exact test (significant P < .05). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve on summary receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. Subgroup analyses were based on expression thresholds (decrease vs complete loss) and classifications used (WHO vs EIN). Results Six studies with 266 normal endometrium, 586 EH, and 114 EC were included. Both decrease and complete loss of PAX2 expression were significantly more common in EC and precancerous EH than benign EH. Diagnostic accuracy was moderate for both PAX2 complete loss and decrease (areas under the curve 0.829 and 0.876, respectively). PAX2 complete loss with EIN system showed the best results (sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.95; DOR = 43.13). Conclusions PAX2 seems to behave as a tumor suppressor in endometrial carcinogenesis. PAX2 is an accurate marker of precancerous EH; complete loss of PAX2 and EIN classification appear as the optimal diagnostic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endometrial Cytology in Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
    Wang, Ting
    Jiang, Ruoan
    Yao, Yingsha
    Wang, Yaping
    Liu, Wu
    Qian, Linhua
    Li, Juanqing
    Weimer, Joerg
    Huang, Xiufeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [2] The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia -: A meta-analysis
    Dijkhuizen, FPHLJ
    Mol, BWJ
    Brölmann, HAM
    Heintz, APM
    [J]. CANCER, 2000, 89 (08) : 1765 - 1772
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling tests for detecting endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sakna, Noha Abdelsattar
    Elgendi, Marwa
    Salama, Mohamed Hamed
    Zeinhom, Ahmed
    Labib, Somia
    Nabhan, Ashraf Fawzy
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [4] Accuracy of Endometrial Sampling in Endometrial Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Visser, Nicole C. M.
    Reijnen, Casper
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    Bulten, Johan
    Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (04): : 803 - 813
  • [5] The value of hysteroscopy and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yao, Yingsha
    Lv, Weiguo
    Xie, Xing
    Cheng, Xiaodong
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (04) : 1179 - +
  • [6] Assessing the prognostic value of PAX2 and PTEN in endometrial carcinogenesis
    Rewcastle, Emma
    Varhaugvik, Anne Elin
    Gudlaugsson, Einar
    Steinbakk, Anita
    Skaland, Ivar
    van Diermen, Bianca
    Baak, Jan P.
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2018, 25 (12) : 981 - 991
  • [7] Diagnostic Accuracy of Liquid Biomarkers for the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karkia, Rebecca
    Wali, Sarah
    Payne, Annette
    Karteris, Emmanouil
    Chatterjee, Jayanta
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [8] Accuracy of endometrial biopsy by Pipelle: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gou, J.
    Li, Z. Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [9] Endometrial telomerase activity in women with either endometrial cancer or hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Perez-Lopez, Faustino R.
    Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R.
    Lopez-Baena, Maria T.
    Yuan, Junhua
    Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A.
    Benites-Zapata, Vicente A.
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2023, 174 : 57 - 66
  • [10] Concurrent and future risk of endometrial cancer in women with endometrial hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Doherty, Michelle T.
    Sanni, Omolara B.
    Coleman, Helen G.
    Cardwell, Chris R.
    McCluggage, W. Glenn
    Quinn, Declan
    Wylie, James
    McMenamin, Una C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (04):