Preferences and perceptions in Provision and Maintenance public goods

被引:9
|
作者
Gaechter, Simon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Koelle, Felix [4 ]
Quercia, Simone [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 1BW, England
[2] CESifo, D-81679 Munich, Germany
[3] IZA, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
[5] Univ Verona, I-37129 Verona, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Maintenance and provision social dilemmas; Conditional cooperation; Kindness; Misperceptions; Experiments; Framing; CONDITIONAL COOPERATION; VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; COLD-PRICKLE; WARM-GLOW; RECIPROCITY; GAME; MISCONCEPTIONS; CONFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2022.06.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study two generic versions of public goods problems: in Provision problems, the public good does not exist initially and needs to be provided; in Maintenance problems, the public good already exists and needs to be maintained. In four lab and online experiments (n = 2,105), we document a robust asymmetry in preferences and perceptions in two incentive -equivalent versions of these public good problems. We find fewer conditional cooperators and more free riders in Maintenance than Provision, a difference that is replicable, stable, and reflected in perceptions of kindness. Incentivized control questions administered before gameplay reveal dilemma-specific misperceptions but controlling for them neither eliminates game-dependent conditional cooperation, nor differences in perceived kindness of others' cooperation. Thus, even when sharing the same game form, Maintenance and Provision are different social dilemmas that require separate behavioral analyses.(C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 355
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条