Risk assessment of river-type hydropower plants using fuzzy logic approach

被引:43
|
作者
Kucukali, Serhat [1 ]
机构
[1] Cankaya Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06530 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Hydropower; Risk Analysis; Fuzzy Logic;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.067
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, a fuzzy rating tool was developed for river-type hydropower plant projects, and risk assessment and expert judgments were utilized instead of probabilistic reasoning. The methodology is a multi-criteria decision analysis, which provides a flexible and easily understood way to analyze project risks. The external risks, which are partly under the control of companies, were considered in the model. A total of eleven classes of risk factors were determined based on the expert interviews, field studies and literature review as follows: site geology, land use, environmental issues, grid connection, social acceptance, macroeconomic, natural hazards, change of laws and regulations, terrorism, access to infrastructure and revenue. The relative importance of risk factors was determined from the survey results. The survey was conducted with the experts that have experience in the construction of river-type hydropower schemes. The survey results revealed that the site geology and environmental issues were considered as the most important risks. The new risk assessment method enabled a Risk Index (R) value to be calculated, establishing a 4-grade evaluation system. The proposed risk analysis will give investors a more rational basis to make decisions and it can prevent cost and schedule overruns. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6683 / 6688
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Economic Comparison of Reservoir Type and Run of the River Type Hydropower Plants: A Case Study for Upper Kotmale Hydropower Plant
    Amanda, H. A. H.
    Wijayapala, W. A. D. S.
    Lucas, J. R.
    Fernando, W. J. L. S.
    ENGINEER-JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS SRI LANKA, 2018, 51 (04): : 75 - 84
  • [42] Environmental risk assessment of small hydropower (SHP) plants: A case study for Tefen SHP plant on Filyos River
    Kucukali, Serhat
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 19 : 102 - 110
  • [43] Application of fuzzy logic to explosion risk assessment
    Markowski, Adam S.
    Mannan, M. Sam
    Kotynia, Agata
    Pawlak, Henryk
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (06) : 780 - 790
  • [44] The fuzzy logic system for risk level assessment
    Lau, H. C. W.
    Cheng, E. N. M.
    Chan, F. T. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ISSAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 26 - +
  • [45] Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA)
    Markowski, Adam S.
    Mannan, M. Sam
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2009, 22 (06) : 921 - 927
  • [46] Risk assessment method based on fuzzy logic
    Zhao, Yuan
    Jiao, Jian
    Zhao, Ting-Di
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (08): : 1825 - 1831
  • [47] A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Fish Growth Assessment
    Magsumbol, Jo-Ann, V
    Almero, Vincent Jan
    Rosales, Marife
    Bandala, Argel A.
    Dadios, Elmer P.
    2019 IEEE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID, NANOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL, ENVIRONMENT, AND MANAGEMENT (HNICEM), 2019,
  • [48] A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA
    González, B
    Adenso-Díaz, B
    González-Torre, PL
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2002, 37 (01) : 61 - 79
  • [49] Fuzzy logic based risk assessment of effluents from waste-water treatment plants
    Cabanillas, Julian
    Ginebreda, Antoni
    Guillen, Daniel
    Martinez, Elena
    Barcelo, Damia
    Moragas, Lucas
    Robuste, Jordi
    Darbra, Rosa Ma
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 439 : 202 - 210
  • [50] Collision risk assessment based on the vulnerability of marine accidents using fuzzy logic
    Hu, Yancai
    Park, Gyei-Kark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 12 : 541 - 551