Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products for Rare Diseases: State of Play of Incentives Supporting Development in Europe

被引:21
|
作者
Farkas, Andreas M. [1 ]
Mariz, Segundo [1 ]
Stoyanova-Beninska, Violeta [2 ,3 ]
Celis, Patrick [1 ]
Vamvakas, Spiros [1 ]
Larsson, Kristina [1 ]
Sepodes, Bruno [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] European Med Agcy, Prod Dev Sci Support Dept, Human Med Res & Dev Support Div, London, England
[2] Coll Beoordeling Geneesmiddelen, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] European Med Agcy, Comm Orphan Med Prod, London, England
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Farm, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
European orphan medicines regulation; Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products; orphan designation; cell therapy; gene therapy; advanced therapy medicinal products;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2017.00053
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In 2008, the European Union introduced the Advanced Medicines Regulation aiming to improve regulation of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). We applied the ATMPs classification definitions in this Regulation to understand the link of this emerging group of medicinal products and the use of the Orphan Regulation. A total of 185 products that can be classified as ATMPs based on this Regulation have been submitted for orphan designation. Prior to its introduction in 2008, 4.5% of the products submitted for orphan designation met these criteria. This percentage went up to 15% after 2008. We analyzed several parameters associated with active ATMP ODDs focusing on sponsor type and EU-Member State origin, therapeutic area targeted, and ATMP classification [i.e., somatic cell therapy medicinal product, tissue-engineered product (TEP), or gene therapy medicinal product (GIMP)] and the use of regulatory services linked to incentives such as the use of protocol assistance (PA) and other Committees [Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) and the Pediatric Committee]. The aim here was to gain insight on the use of different services. The UK submits the largest number of ATMPs for ODD representing similar to 30% of the total to date. Few submissions have been received from central and Eastern European Member States as well as some of the larger Member States such as Germany (3.6%). ATMPs ODDs were primarily GTMPs (48.7%) and SCTMPs (43.3%). TEPs only represented 8% of all submissions for this medicinal class. This is different from non-ODDs ATMPs where GTMPs make only 20% of ATMPs. A total of 11.7% of ATMP ODDs had received formal CAT classification. A total of 29.8% of all orphan drug (OD) ATMPs requested PA. A total of 71.8% did not have an agreed pediatric investigation plan (PIP). Four products (Glybera one PA; Zalmoxis two; Holoclar one; Strimvelis three) have received a marketing authorization (MM) and a 10-year market exclusivity. Strimvelis also completed their PIP, which was compliant and received the additional 2-year extension to their 10-year market exclusivity. One OD ATMP (Cerepro) received a negative opinion for MAA. The use of services linked to incentives offered by different legislations for ATMP ODDs is low, indicating a need for increasing awareness.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (ATMPs): DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION IN EUROPE
    Tsiftsoglou, Asterios S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 50 : E42 - E42
  • [2] Advances and Challenges in the Development of Gene Therapy Medicinal Products for Rare Diseases
    Bueren, Juan A.
    Auricchio, Alberto
    HUMAN GENE THERAPY, 2023, 34 (17-18) : 763 - 775
  • [3] REIMBURSEMENT OF ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN EUROPE
    Hanna, E.
    Marre, C.
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S202 - S203
  • [4] Access Challenges of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe
    Szulc, E.
    Tschumi, B.
    Pennese, N.
    Lecureuil, C.
    Robbins, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S336 - S336
  • [5] THE REIMBURSEMENT STATUS OF ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN EUROPE
    Hanna, E.
    Marre, C.
    Toumi, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S428 - S428
  • [6] Clinical Development of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe: Evidence That Regulators Must Be Proactive
    Maciulaitis, Romaldas
    D'Apote, Lucia
    Buchanan, Andrew
    Pioppo, Laura
    Schneider, Christian K.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2012, 20 (03) : 479 - 482
  • [7] THE REGULATION OF ADVANCED THERAPY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS IN EUROPE AND THE ROLE OF ACADEMIA
    Pearce, K. F.
    Hildebrandt, M. O.
    Scheding, S.
    Koehl, U.
    Mischak-Weissinger, E.
    Hauser, A.
    Edinger, M.
    Greinix, H.
    Worel, N.
    Apperley, J.
    Lowdell, M. W.
    Dickinson, A. M.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2013, 15 (04) : S51 - S52
  • [8] Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products' Translation in Europe: A Developers' Perspective
    Pizevska, Maja
    Kaeda, Jaspal
    Fritsche, Enrico
    Elazaly, Hisham
    Reinke, Petra
    Amini, Leila
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [9] The regulation of advanced therapy medicinal products in Europe and the role of academia
    Lowdell, M. W.
    Pearce, K. F.
    Apperley, J.
    Dickinson, A. M.
    Edinger, M.
    Greinix, H.
    Hauser, A.
    Koehl, U.
    Mischak-Weissinger, E.
    Scheding, S.
    Worel, N.
    Hildebrandt, M.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 : S510 - S510
  • [10] Europe's Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: chances and challenges
    Mertsching, Heike
    Walles, Thorsten
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2009, 6 (02) : 109 - 110