AdaBoost classifiers for pecan defect classification

被引:64
|
作者
Mathanker, S. K. [1 ]
Weckler, P. R. [1 ]
Bowser, T. J. [1 ]
Wang, N. [1 ]
Maness, N. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Biosyst & Agr Engn, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Hort & Landscape Architecture, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
AdaBoost; Support vector machine; Pecan; Food safety machine vision inspection; Pattern recognition; Machine learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2011.03.008
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
One of the constraints in the adoption of machine vision inspection systems for food products is low classification accuracy. This study attempts to improve pecan defect classification accuracy by using machine learning classifiers: AdaBoost and support vector machine (SVM). X-ray images of good and defective pecans, 100 each, were segmented and features were extracted. Twenty classification runs were made to adjust parameters and 300 classification runs to compare classifiers. The Real AdaBoost classifier gave average classification accuracy of 92.2% for the Reverse water flow segmentation method and 92.3% for the Twice Otsu segmentation method. The Linear SVM classifier gave average classification accuracy of 90.1% for the Reverse water flow method and 92.7% for the Twice Otsu method. Computational time for the classifiers varied by two orders of magnitude: Bayesian (10(-4) s), SVM (10(-5) s), and AdaBoost (10(-6) s). AdaBoost classifiers improved classification accuracy by 7% when Bayesian accuracy was poor (less than 89%). The AdaBoost classifiers also adapted well to data variability and segmentation methods. A minimalist AdaBoost classifier, more suitable for real time applications, using fewer features can be built. Overall, the selected AdaBoost classifiers improved classification accuracy, reduced classification time, and performed consistently better for pecan defect classification. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 68
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaboost Ensemble Data Classification Based on Diversity of classifiers
    Thammasiri, Dech
    Meesad, Phayung
    [J]. MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3682 - +
  • [2] AdaBoost Ensemble Data Classification based on Diversity of Classifiers
    Thammasiri, Dech
    Meesad, Phayung
    [J]. FUTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 13 : 106 - 111
  • [3] Gentle Adaboost Algorithm for Weld Defect Classification
    Mekhalfa, Faiza
    Nacereddine, Nafaa
    [J]. 2017 SIGNAL PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS, ARCHITECTURES, ARRANGEMENTS, AND APPLICATIONS (SPA 2017), 2017, : 301 - 306
  • [4] Supervised image classification based on AdaBoost with contextual weak classifiers
    Nishii, R
    Eguchi, S
    [J]. IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 1467 - 1470
  • [5] On the selection of fuzzy classifiers using AdaBoost
    Iqbal, RT
    Qidwai, U
    [J]. SCONEST 2004: STUDENT CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, : 67 - 72
  • [6] Information theoretic combination of classifiers with application to AdaBoost
    Meynet, Julien
    Thiran, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4472 : 171 - +
  • [7] AdaBoost with SVM-based component classifiers
    Li, Xuchun
    Wang, Lei
    Sung, Eric
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 21 (05) : 785 - 795
  • [8] Improved algorithm for AdaBoost with SVM base classifiers
    Wang, Xiaodan
    Wu, Chongming
    Meng, Chunying
    Wang, Wei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 948 - 952
  • [9] Corporate Default Prediction with AdaBoost and Bagging Classifiers
    Ramakrishnan, Suresh
    Mirzaei, Maryam
    Bekri, Mahmoud
    [J]. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 73 (02):
  • [10] Weak Classifiers Selecting based on PSO in AdaBoost
    Li, Rui
    Zhang, Jiurui
    Mao, Li
    [J]. 2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MULTIMEDIA ENGINEERING (FSME 2011), 2011, 7 : 6 - 12