Cardiovascular risk prediction: Can Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) be improved by adding simple risk markers? Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study

被引:37
|
作者
Graversen, Peter [1 ]
Abildstrom, Steen Z. [1 ]
Jespersen, Lasse [1 ]
Borglykke, Anders [2 ]
Prescott, Eva [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Cardiovascular disease; discrimination; risk stratification; risk markers; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; DISEASE PREDICTION; CLINICALLY USEFUL; EVENTS; POPULATION; BIOMARKERS; MODELS; RECLASSIFICATION; MORTALITY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1177/2047487316638201
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim European society of cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend that cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals is based on the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) algorithm, which estimates individual 10-year risk of death from CVD. We assessed the potential improvement in CVD risk stratification of 19 easily available risk markers by adding them to the SCORE algorithm. Methods and results We followed 8476 individuals without prior CVD or diabetes from the Copenhagen City Heart study. The 19 risk markers were: major and minor electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, heart rate, family history (of ischaemic heart disease), body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio, walking duration and pace, leisure time physical activity, forced expiratory volume (FEV)(1%pred), household income, education, vital exhaustion, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and fibrinogen. With the exception of family history, BMI, triglycerides and minor ECG changes, all risk markers remained significantly associated with CVD mortality after adjustment for SCORE variables. However, the addition of the remaining 15 risk markers resulted in only small changes in discrimination calculated by area under the curve (AUC) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and no improvement in net reclassification improvement (NRI). HsCRP improved AUC by 0.006 (p=0.015) and IDI by 0.012 (p=0.002); FEV1%pred improved AUC by 0.006 (p=0.032) and IDI by 0.006 (p=0.029). In the intermediate risk group FEV1%pred, education, vital exhaustion and ApoA1 all improved NRI but FEV1%pred was the only risk marker to significantly improve both IDI, AUC and NRI. Conclusion The SCORE algorithm predicted CVD mortality in a Danish cohort well. Despite strong association with CVD mortality, the individual addition of 19 easily available risk makers to the SCORE model resulted in small risk stratification improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:1546 / 1556
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a recalibrated systematic coronary risk evaluation cardiovascular risk chart:: results from systematic coronary risk evaluation Germany
    Hense, Hans-Werner
    Koesters, Eva
    Wellmann, Juergen
    Meisinger, Christa
    Voelzke, Henry
    Keil, Ulrich
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (04): : 409 - 415
  • [2] Risk prediction is improved by adding markers of subclinical organ damage to SCORE
    Sehestedt, Thomas
    Jeppesen, Jorgen
    Hansen, Tine W.
    Wachtell, Kristian
    Ibsens, Hans
    Torp-Petersen, Christian
    Hildebrandt, Per
    Olsen, Michael H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (07) : 883 - 891
  • [3] Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism Results From the Copenhagen City Heart Study
    Holst, Anders G.
    Jensen, Gorm
    Prescott, Eva
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 121 (17) : 1896 - 1903
  • [4] Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism: Results From the Copenhagen City Heart Study
    Holst, Anders G.
    Prescott, Eva
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S535 - S535
  • [5] Prediction of coronary heart disease: a comparison between the Copenhagen risk score and the Framingham risk score applied to a Dutch population
    de Visser, CL
    Bilo, HJG
    Thomsen, TF
    Groenier, KH
    Meyboom-De Jong, B
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 253 (05) : 553 - 562
  • [6] Predictive improvement of adding coronary calcium score and a genetic risk score to a traditional risk model for cardiovascular event prediction
    Temtem, Margarida
    Mendonca, Maria Isabel
    Serrao, Marco Gomes
    Santos, Marina
    Sa, Debora
    Sousa, Francisco
    Soares, Carolina
    Rodrigues, Ricardo
    Henriques, Eva
    Freitas, Sonia
    Borges, Sofia
    Rodrigues, Mariana
    Guerra, Graca
    Freitas, Antonio Drumond
    Sousa, Ana Celia
    dos Reis, Roberto Palma
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 709 - 715
  • [7] Novel risk markers improved Framingham Risk Score cardiovascular event prediction in intermediate-risk adults
    Steinberg, Daniel I.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (12)
  • [8] Risk prediction for coronary heart disease by a genetic risk score-results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study
    Pechlivanis, Sonali
    Lehmann, Nils
    Hoffmann, Per
    Noethen, Markus M.
    Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
    Erbel, Raimund
    Moebus, Susanne
    BMC MEDICAL GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] Lipoprotein (a) increases the Risk of Infarction Results of the Copenhagen City Heart study
    Hucko, T.
    Graf, K.
    KARDIOLOGE, 2008, 2 (02): : 112 - 113
  • [10] SYSTEMATIC CORONARY RISK EVALUATION (SCORE) MISCLASSIFIES CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN ANTISYNTHETASE SYNDROME: RESULTS OF THE PILOT MULTICENTRIC STUDY RI.CARDA
    Triantafyllias, K.
    Klonowski, A.
    Cavagna, L.
    Drott, U.
    Voll, R.
    Fiehn, C.
    De Blasi, M.
    Wendel, S.
    Bergner, R.
    Schwarting, A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 : 411 - 411