Rock-physics constrained seismic anisotropy parameter estimation

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Fuyong [1 ]
Han, De-Hua [1 ]
Yao, Qiuliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Houston, TX 77204 USA
关键词
NONHYPERBOLIC MOVEOUT; REFLECTION MOVEOUT; VELOCITY ANALYSIS; TRAVEL-TIMES; APPROXIMATION; INVERSION; WAVE;
D O I
10.1190/GEO2019-0153.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Compared with isotropic media, at least two extra parameters are involved in common P-wave seismic data processing and interpretation for transversely isotropic media. Previous synthetic model testing has shown that it is challenging to estimate anisotropy parameters even using extremely low noise level seismic data from a simple geologic setting. Although theoretically independent, anisotropy parameters are not free variables for organic-rich mudrocks whose elastic properties are often approximated by transverse isotropy. One potential approach to improve the accuracy in the estimated anisotropy parameters is to consider the physical relationships between them during the inversion process. To test this proposition, we first modify a commonly used nonhyperbolic reflection moveout equation as a function of the interval anisotropy velocities so that rock-physics constraints could be effectively applied to each layer. The rock physics constraints are established from data analysis of selected laboratory anisotropy measurement data. The laboratory data are then used to parameterize hundreds of 15-layer transverse isotropy models using a Monte Carlo simulation. The synthetic model testing indicates that the accuracy of the estimated anisotropy parameters can be improved if the relationships between the anisotropy parameters are considered during the inversion process.
引用
收藏
页码:MR247 / MR253
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving seismic QP estimation using rock-physics constraints
    Shen Y.
    Dvorkin J.
    Li Y.
    [J]. Geophysics, 2018, 83 (03): : MR187 - MR198
  • [2] Improving seismic QP estimation using rock-physics constraints
    Shen, Yi
    Dvorkin, Jack
    Li, Yunyue
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (03) : MR187 - MR198
  • [3] Rock-physics templates based on seismic Q
    Picotti, Stefano
    Carcione, Jose M.
    Ba, Jing
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (01) : MR13 - MR23
  • [4] Rock-physics templates based on seismic Q
    Picotti S.
    Carcione J.M.
    Ba J.
    [J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84 (01): : MR13 - MR23
  • [5] On the rock-physics basis for seismic hydrocarbon detection
    Jiang, Lian
    Castagna, John P.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (01) : MR25 - MR35
  • [6] Probabilistic seismic inversion based on rock-physics models
    Spikes, Kyle
    Mukerji, Tapan
    Dvorkin, Jack
    Mavko, Gary
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (05) : R87 - R97
  • [7] Estimation of porosity and fluid saturation in carbonates from rock-physics templates based on seismic Q
    Pang, Mengqiang
    Ba, Jing
    Carcione, Jose M.
    Picotti, Stefano
    Zhou, Jian
    Jiang, Ren
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (06) : M25 - M36
  • [8] Seismic screening of rock stiffness and fluid softening using rock-physics attributes
    Avseth, Per
    Veggeland, Tor
    [J]. INTERPRETATION-A JOURNAL OF SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION, 2015, 3 (04): : SAE85 - SAE93
  • [9] Elastic-impedance analysis constrained by rock-physics bounds
    Tsuneyama, Futoshi
    Mavko, Gary
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2007, 55 (03) : 289 - 306
  • [10] Effects of uncertainty in rock-physics models on reservoir parameter estimation using seismic amplitude variation with angle and controlled-source electromagnetics data
    Chen, Jinsong
    Dickens, Thomas A.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2009, 57 (01) : 61 - 74