Interview validation of the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC)

被引:5
|
作者
Quinn, Katherine N. [1 ]
Wieman, Carl [2 ,3 ]
Holmes, N. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Phys Dept, 144 East Ave, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Phys Dept, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94041 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Educ, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94041 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1119/perc.2017.pr.076
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although an important goal of introductory physics labs is to train students in scientific reasoning and critical thinking, currently there are no standard tests in physics designed to assess such skills. We are in the process of developing and validating the Physics Lab Inventory of Critical thinking (PLIC), an assessment to probe students' critical thinking abilities in physics lab courses. The instrument asks students to critique a set of experimental methods and data and use them to evaluate a particular physical model (the period of a mass on a spring). Currently, we are validating the closed-response survey through interviews with students and present the results of 12 such interviews here. We describe a trend that has emerged from these interviews, with students' reasoning falling into three main patterns of behavior: selecting all options, cuing on keywords, and critically analyzing. We have found ways to shift students to the last and more desirable behavior. We discuss ways in which these findings are likely relevant to the design of other concept inventories.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 327
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying critical thinking: Development and validation of the physics lab inventory of critical thinking
    Walsh, Cole
    Quinn, Katherine N.
    Wieman, C.
    Holmes, N. G.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (01):
  • [2] Developing quantitative critical thinking in the introductory physics lab
    Holmes, N. G.
    [J]. 2015 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2015, : 14 - 17
  • [3] Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism
    Dawit Tibebu Tiruneh
    Mieke De Cock
    Ataklti G. Weldeslassie
    Jan Elen
    Rianne Janssen
    [J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2017, 15 : 663 - 682
  • [4] Measuring Critical Thinking in Physics: Development and Validation of a Critical Thinking Test in Electricity and Magnetism
    Tiruneh, Dawit Tibebu
    De Cock, Mieke
    Weldeslassie, Ataklti G.
    Elen, Jan
    Janssen, Rianne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2017, 15 (04) : 663 - 682
  • [5] TRANSLATION AND VALIDATION OF A TURKISH VERSION OF THE CALIFORNIA CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITION INVENTORY
    Iskifoglu, Gokhan
    Agazade, Ali Sidki
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2013, 41 (02): : 187 - 196
  • [6] Critical thinking in the GI lab
    Blair, Carolyn
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2007, 30 (02) : 142 - 142
  • [7] Preliminary development and validation of a diagnostic of critical thinking for introductory physics labs
    Holmes, N. G.
    Wieman, Carl
    [J]. 2016 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2016, : 156 - 159
  • [8] The Effect of HOT-Lab to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Prospective Physics Teachers
    Malik, Adam
    Setiawan, Agus
    Suhandi, Andi
    Permanasari, Anna
    Hermita, Neni
    [J]. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (11) : 8059 - 8062
  • [9] Impact of traditional physics lab instruction on students' critical thinking skills in a Finnish context
    Pirinen, P.
    Lehtinen, A.
    Holmes, N. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2023, 44 (03)
  • [10] Comparing study features is easy but identifying next steps is hard: Evaluating critical thinking through the Biology Lab Inventory of Critical Thinking in Ecology
    Heim, Ashley B. B.
    Esparza, David
    Holmes, Natasha G. G.
    Smith, Michelle K. K.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 13 (05):