Why Don't People Trust Experts?

被引:17
|
作者
Hilger, Nathaniel G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS | 2016年 / 59卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CREDENCE GOODS; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; REGIONAL-VARIATIONS; MARKET; INFORMATION; ECONOMICS; QUALITY; COMPETITION; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1086/687076
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Credence goods such as health care, legal and financial services, and auto repair create a conflict of interest by requiring experts to diagnose and provide services to uninformed consumers. Mistreatment of consumers appears widespread empirically, but a simple explanation for mistreatment under realistic assumptions has proved elusive. I generalize Uwe Dulleck and Rudolf Kerschbamer's credence-good model to incorporate the highly realistic assumption that consumers do not observe experts' cost functions. The model guarantees equilibrium mistreatment in a wide range of price-setting and market environments. The model also yields testable implications regarding the nature of mistreating firms and the direction of mistreatment.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 311
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条