Sources of uncertainties in prompt gamma activation analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Mackey, EA [1 ]
Paul, RL
Lindstrom, RM
Anderson, DL
Greenberg, RR
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Analyt Chem Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] US FDA, Elemental Res Branch, Ctr Food Safety & Appl Nutr, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10967-005-0820-8
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two prompt gamma-ray activation analysis (PGAA) facilities at the NIST Center for Neutron Research have been used routinely to perform elemental analyses of a variety of materials. Results from these analyses are usually expressed as mass fraction values with expanded uncertainties. The expanded uncertainty consists of the combined uncertainty multiplied by the appropriate coverage factor (k) required to achieve a 95% confidence interval. The combined uncertainty includes the uncertainties associated with preparation, irradiation, and gamma-ray spectrometry of samples and standards, and corrections for gamma-rays from the background or blanks where necessary. To determine the combined uncertainty, each component of uncertainty associated with each variable and constant in the basic measurement equation is evaluated. In this paper we present the PGAA measurement equation, a description of the potential sources of uncertainty for each component of the equation, and three examples of uncertainty evaluation. The examples are for determination of H in standard reference material (SRM) 2454, hydrogen in titanium alloy using the cold neutron PGAA facility, Cd in SRM 2702 Inorganics in Marine Sediment using the original thermal neutron PGAA facility, and N in SRM 3244 Ephedra-Containing Protein Powder using the recently designed thermal neutron PGAA facility.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sources of uncertainties in prompt gamma activation analysis
    E. A. Mackey
    R. L. Paul
    R. M. Lindstrom
    D. L. Anderson
    [J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2005, 265 : 273 - 281
  • [2] Calculation of uncertainties in prompt gamma activation analysis
    Revay, Zsolt
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2006, 564 (02): : 688 - 697
  • [3] Evaluation of uncertainties in prompt gamma-ray activation analysis
    Paul, RL
    Mackey, EA
    Lindstrom, RM
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U415 - U415
  • [4] PROMPT GAMMA-ACTIVATION ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN
    DOWNEY, DM
    SANDY, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1986, 63 (02) : 178 - 180
  • [5] PROMPT-GAMMA ACTIVATION-ANALYSIS
    LINDSTROM, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 98 (01) : 127 - 133
  • [6] Progress of prompt gamma activation analysis in Korea
    C. S. Park
    G. M. Sun
    S. H. Byun
    H. D. Choi
    [J]. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2005, 265 : 283 - 286
  • [7] Progress of prompt gamma activation analysis in Korea
    Park, CS
    Sun, GM
    Byun, SH
    Choi, HD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2005, 265 (02) : 283 - 286
  • [8] Standardisation of the prompt gamma activation analysis method
    Révay, Z
    Molnár, GL
    [J]. RADIOCHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 91 (06) : 361 - 369
  • [9] Inactive tracing with prompt gamma activation analysis
    Ember, PP
    Révay, Z
    Belgya, T
    Molnár, G
    [J]. MAGYAR KEMIAI FOLYOIRAT, 2001, 107 (10): : 438 - 443
  • [10] Prompt gamma activation analysis at the Budapest Research Reactor
    Belgya, T.
    [J]. GAMMA-1 EMISSION OF PROMPT GAMMA-RAYS IN FISSION AND RELATED TOPICS, 2012, 31 : 99 - 109