Increased Prediction Ability in Norway Spruce Trials Using a Marker X Environment Interaction and Non-Additive Genomic Selection Model

被引:13
|
作者
Chen, Zhi-Qiang [1 ]
Baison, John [1 ]
Pan, Jin [1 ]
Westin, Johan [2 ]
Gil, Maria Rosario Garcia [1 ]
Wu, Harry X. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Umea Plant Sci Ctr, Dept Forest Genet & Plant Physiol, SE-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Skogforsk, Box 3, SE-91821 Savar, Sweden
[3] Beijing Forestry Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Tree Breeding Mol Design, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] CSIRO Natl Collect Res Australia, Black Mt Lab, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
dominance; epistasis; exome capture; Picea abies (L.) Karst; WOOD QUALITY; BREEDING STRATEGIES; GENETIC GAINS; WHITE SPRUCE; DOMINANCE; GROWTH; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; PARAMETERS; DEPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1093/jhered/esz061
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A genomic selection study of growth and wood quality traits is reported based on control-pollinated Norway spruce families established in 2 Northern Swedish trials at 2 locations using exome capture as a genotyping platform. Nonadditive effects including dominance and first-order epistatic interactions (including additive-by-additive, dominance-by-dominance, and additive-by-dominance) and marker-by-environment interaction (MxE) effects were dissected in genomic and phenotypic selection models. Genomic selection models partitioned additive and nonadditive genetic variances more precisely than pedigree-based models. In addition, predictive ability in GS was substantially increased by including dominance and slightly increased by including MxE effects when these effects are significant. For velocity, response to genomic selection per year increased up to 78.9/80.8%, 86.9/82.9%, and 91.3/88.2% compared with response to phenotypic selection per year when genomic selection was based on 1) main marker effects (M), 2) M + MxE effects (A), and 3) A + dominance effects (AD) for sites 1 and 2, respectively. This indicates that including MxE and dominance effects not only improves genetic parameter estimates but also when they are significant may improve the genetic gain. For tree height, Pilodyn, and modulus of elasticity (MOE), response to genomic selection per year improved up to 68.9%, 91.3%, and 92.6% compared with response to phenotypic selection per year, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:830 / 843
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker x Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model
    Lopez-Cruz, Marco
    Crossa, Jose
    Bonnett, David
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Poland, Jesse
    Jannink, Jean-Luc
    Singh, Ravi P.
    Autrique, Enrique
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2015, 5 (04): : 569 - 582
  • [2] Integrated model for genomic prediction under additive and non-additive genetic architecture
    Budhlakoti, Neeraj
    Mishra, Dwijesh Chandra
    Majumdar, Sayanti Guha
    Kumar, Anuj
    Srivastava, Sudhir
    Rai, S. N.
    Rai, Anil
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [3] Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees
    de Almeida Filho, Janeo Eustaquio
    Rodrigues Guimaraes, Joao Filipi
    Fonsceca e Silva, Fabyano
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    Munoz, Patricio
    Kirst, Matias
    Ribeiro de Resende Junior, Marcio Fernando
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2019, 9 (08): : 2739 - 2748
  • [4] GENOMIC PREDICTION BY CONSIDERING GENOTYPE x ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION USING DIFFERENT GENOMIC ARCHITECTURES
    Bohlouli, Mehdi
    Alijani, Sadegh
    Javaremi, Ardashir Nejati
    Koenig, Sven
    Yin, Tong
    ANNALS OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 17 (03): : 683 - 701
  • [5] Genomic-enabled prediction models using multi-environment trials to estimate the effect of genotype x environment interaction on prediction accuracy in chickpea
    Roorkiwal, Manish
    Jarquin, Diego
    Singh, Muneendra K.
    Gaur, Pooran M.
    Bharadwaj, Chellapilla
    Rathore, Abhishek
    Howard, Reka
    Srinivasan, Samineni
    Jain, Ankit
    Garg, Vanika
    Kale, Sandip
    Chitikineni, Annapurna
    Tripathi, Shailesh
    Jones, Elizabeth
    Robbins, Kelly R.
    Crossa, Jose
    Varshney, Rajeev K.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [6] Genomic Bayesian Prediction Model for Count Data with Genotype x Environment Interaction
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Crossa, Jose
    Burgueno, Juan
    Eskridge, Kent M.
    Falconi-Castillo, Esteban
    He, Xinyao
    Singh, Pawan
    Cichy, Karen
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2016, 6 (05): : 1165 - 1177
  • [7] Relatedness and Genotype x Environment Interaction Affect Prediction Accuracies in Genomic Selection: A Study in Cassava
    Ly, Delphine
    Hamblin, Martha
    Rabbi, Ismail
    Melaku, Gedil
    Bakare, Moshood
    Gauch, Hugh G., Jr.
    Okechukwu, Richardson
    Dixon, Alfred G. O.
    Kulakow, Peter
    Jannink, Jean-Luc
    CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (04) : 1312 - 1325
  • [8] A Variational Bayes Genomic- Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype x Environment Interaction
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    Cricelio Montesinos-Lopez, Jose
    Javier Luna-Vazquez, Francisco
    Salinas-Ruiz, Josafhat
    Herrera-Morales, Jose R.
    Buenrostro-Mariscal, Raymundo
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2017, 7 (06): : 1833 - 1853
  • [9] Extending the Marker x Environment Interaction Model for Genomic-Enabled Prediction and Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Durum Wheat
    Crossa, Jose
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    Maccaferri, Marco
    Tuberosa, Roberto
    Burgueno, J.
    Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino
    CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (05) : 2193 - 2209
  • [10] Genomic-enabled Prediction Accuracies Increased by Modeling Genotype x Environment Interaction in Durum Wheat
    Sukumaran, Sivakumar
    Jarquin, Diego
    Crossa, Jose
    Reynolds, Matthew
    PLANT GENOME, 2018, 11 (02):