Ethnic impact of NICE guideline on induction of labour at 41 weeks

被引：0
|
作者：
Choi, Jenny [1 ]
Viswanatha, Radhika [1 ]
Ganapathy, Ramesh [1 ]
机构：
[1] Epsom & St Helier NHS Trust, London, England
来源：
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 2022年 / 129卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
EP.1152
引用
收藏
页码：222 / 223
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NICE backtracks on advice to induce labour at 39 weeks in ethnic minority women
    Torjesen, Ingrid
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 375 : n2703
  • [2] Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks gestation: nonsensus consensus
    Menticoglou, SM
    Hall, PF
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (05) : 485 - 491
  • [3] Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation: nonsensus consensus
    Leung, WC
    Lao, TT
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (12) : 1416 - 1417
  • [4] Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Alkmark, M.
    Wennerholm, U-B
    Saltvedt, S.
    Bergh, C.
    Carlsson, Y.
    Elden, H.
    Fadl, H.
    Jonsson, M.
    Ladfors, L.
    Sengpiel, V
    Wesstrom, J.
    Hagberg, H.
    Svensson, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 (13) : 2157 - 2165
  • [5] Doctors question NICE recommendation to induce labour at 39 weeks in ethnic minority women
    Mahase, Elisabeth
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 374 : n1711
  • [6] Cost effectiveness of induction of labour at 41 versus 42 weeks of gestation
    Ahmed, Rubayyi
    Ahmed, Sheikh Mohammad
    Rauf, Sameer Abdul
    Baig, Rooha
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023,
  • [7] Outcome of induction of labour at 41 weeks with foley catheter in midwifery-led care
    Velthuijs, Eva L. M.
    Jacod, Benoit C.
    Videler-Sinke, Lizette
    Kooij, Caroline
    van Rheenen-Flach, Leonie E.
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2024, 135
  • [8] Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
    Wennerholm, U. B.
    Saltvedt, S.
    Wessberg, A.
    Alkmark, M.
    Bergh, C.
    Wendel, Brismar S.
    Fadl, H.
    Jonsson, M.
    Ladfors, L.
    Sengpiel, V
    Wesstrom, J.
    Wennergren, G.
    Wikstrom, A. K.
    Elden, H.
    Stephansson, O.
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (10) : E76 - E76
  • [9] Induction of Labour at 41 Weeks Versus Expectant Management and Induction of Labour at 42 Weeks (SWEdish Post-Term Induction Study, SWEPIS): Multicentre, Open Label, Randomised, Superiority Trial
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Wessberg, Anna
    Alkmark, Marten
    Bergh, Christina
    Brismar Wendel, Sophia
    Fadl, Helena
    Jonsson, Maria
    Ladfors, Lars
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Wesstrom, Jan
    Wennergren, Goeran
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Elden, Helen
    Stephansson, Olof
    Hagberg, Henrik
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2020, 75 (04) : 207 - 209
  • [10] Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Wessberg, Anna
    Alkmark, Marten
    Bergh, Christina
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    Fadl, Helena
    Jonsson, Maria
    Ladfors, Lars
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Wesstrom, Jan
    Wennergren, Goran
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Elden, Helen
    Stephansson, Olof
    Hagberg, Henrik
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
12345