Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs

被引:246
|
作者
Herrero, Mario [1 ]
Thornton, Philip K. [1 ]
Gerber, Pierre [2 ]
Reid, Robin S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Food & Agr Org United Nations FAO, Rome, Italy
[3] Colorado State Univ, Ctr Collaborat Conservat, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LAND-USE; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; CROP; DEFORESTATION; GRASSLAND; MANAGEMENT; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Livestock are a global resource of significant benefits to society in the form of food, income, nutrients, employment, insurance, traction, clothing and others. In the process of providing these benefits, livestock can use a significant amount of land, nutrients, feed, water and other resources and generate 18% of anthropogenic global greenhouse gases. The total demand for livestock products might almost double by 2050, mostly in the developing world owing to increases in population density, urbanization and increased incomes. Multiple existing trade-offs and competing demands for natural resources will intensify, but reducing livestock product demand in places and capitalizing on the positive aspects of livestock systems such as the potential for sustainable intensification of mixed systems, the potential of ecosystems services payments in rangeland systems and well-regulated industrial livestock production might help achieve the goals of balancing livestock production, livelihoods and environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 120
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Trade-Offs and Policy Views
    Settele, Sonja
    Shupe, Cortnie
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2022, 132 (643): : 1150 - 1178
  • [2] Trade-offs in plant responses to the environment
    Sparks, Erin E.
    Rasmussen, Amanda
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 46 (10): : 2943 - 2945
  • [3] Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions
    Meyfroidt, Patrick
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 16 : 9 - 16
  • [4] Conservation and livelihoods: identifying trade-offs and win-wins
    Fisher, Brendan P.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (07) : 343 - 343
  • [5] Historical trade-offs of livestock's environmental impacts
    Davis, Kyle Frankel
    Yu, Kailiang
    Herrero, Mario
    Havlik, Petr
    Carr, Joel A.
    D'Odorico, Paolo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [6] TRADE-OFFS: UNDERSTANDING FUTURE TRADE OPTIONS FOR SCOTLAND
    Figus, Gioele
    McGregor, Peter
    McIntyre, Stuart
    Roy, Graeme
    [J]. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 260 : 26 - 39
  • [7] AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING BUDGETARY TRADE-OFFS
    BERRY, WD
    LOWERY, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1990, 34 (03) : 671 - 705
  • [8] Creating Walkable Communities: Understanding Trade-Offs
    Carlson, Susan A.
    Omura, John D.
    Watson, Kathleen B.
    Fulton, Janet E.
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2018, 15
  • [9] Built environment energy trade-offs scaling
    Pan, R.
    Gutowski, T. G.
    Sekulic, D. P.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 1374 - 1383
  • [10] Livestock in no-till cropping systems - a story of trade-offs
    Fisher, James
    Tozer, Peter
    Abrecht, Doug
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (04) : 197 - 214