Cochlear Implant Nonuse: Insight from Deaf Adults

被引:5
|
作者
Salehomoum, Maryam [1 ]
机构
[1] Emerson Coll, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
关键词
CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS; IDENTITY; OUTCOMES; LANGUAGE; SPEECH; AGE;
D O I
10.1093/deafed/enaa002
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Research examining the outcome of pediatric cochlear implantation consists of certain limitations, including the use of assessments that are often restricted to auditory-spoken skills, biased recruitment practices, and lack of consideration for identity development. To better understand the long-term outcome of implantation, it is vital to seek out individuals who decide to stop using their device and elicit feedback related to their decision. Thus, 11 adults, who were past cochlear implant (CI) users, were interviewed to gain insight into factors that had led to their decision regarding cochlear implant nonuse. Results indicated several variables to have played a role, but the most prominent factors were limitations in postimplant auditory perceptual development and development of a d/Deaf identity. Although cochlear implant practices and technology have improved over the past few decades, we need to recognize the continued variability in outcome to ensure the provision of the most accurate information and appropriate services.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 282
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Results of cochlear implant in postlinguistically deaf adults
    Wu, H
    Mosnier, I
    Dahan, EA
    Viala, P
    Bouccara, D
    Sterkers, O
    [J]. UPDATES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2000, 57 : 382 - 384
  • [2] The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults
    Krabbe, PFM
    Hinderink, JB
    van den Broek, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 16 (03) : 864 - 873
  • [3] COMPARISON OF BENEFIT FROM VIBROTACTILE AID AND COCHLEAR IMPLANT FOR POSTLINGUISTICALLY DEAF ADULTS
    SKINNER, MW
    BINZER, SM
    SMITH, PG
    HOLDEN, LK
    FREDRICKSON, JM
    HOLDEN, TA
    JUELICH, MF
    TURNER, BA
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 1988, 98 (10): : 1092 - 1099
  • [4] Speech perception by prelingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implant
    Tyler, R
    Parkinson, AJ
    FryaufBertchy, H
    Lowder, MW
    Parkinson, WS
    Gantz, BJ
    Kelsay, DMR
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1997, 26 : 65 - 71
  • [5] OPPOSITION FROM DEAF GROUPS TO THE COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    MOHAY, H
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 155 (10) : 719 - 720
  • [6] Satisfaction with the cochlear implant of pre- and postlingually deaf adults
    Lee, SH
    Kim, CS
    Kim, HN
    Kim, LS
    Huh, MJ
    Cho, TH
    Shim, YJ
    [J]. UPDATES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2000, 57 : 273 - 276
  • [7] OPPOSITION FROM DEAF GROUPS TO THE COCHLEAR IMPLANT
    GIBSON, WPR
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1991, 155 (04) : 211 - 214
  • [8] Can Mandarin-speaking prelingual deaf adults benefit from cochlear implant?
    Huang, Po-Kai
    Ho, Pei-Hsuan
    Chu, Chia-Huei
    Chen, Pey-Yu
    Lin, Hung-Ching
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2024, 144 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [9] Cochlear implant and the deaf culture
    Bryce, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1996, 17 (03): : 496 - 496
  • [10] THE COCHLEAR IMPLANT AND THE DEAF COMMUNITY
    POWER, DJ
    HYDE, MB
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1992, 157 (06) : 421 - 422