Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting

被引:57
|
作者
Koopman, Axel S. [1 ]
Kingma, Idsart [1 ]
de Looze, Michiel P. [1 ,2 ]
van Dieen, Jaap H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Van der Boechorstr 9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Low-back pain; Mechanical loading; Passive exoskeletons; Compression forces; Lifting; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ERECTOR SPINAE; RISK-FACTORS; WORK; BODY; EMG; MODEL; MUSCULATURE; MUSCLES; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109486
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Low-back pain is the number one cause of disability in the world, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. Exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace to reduce low back loading. During static forward bending, exoskeletons have been shown to reduce back muscle activity by 10% to 40%. However, effects during dynamic lifting are not well documented. Relative support of the exoskeleton might be smaller in lifting compared to static bending due to higher peak loads. In addition, exoskeletons might also result in changes in lifting behavior, which in turn could affect low back loading. The present study investigated the effect of a passive exoskeleton on peak compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during symmetric lifting. Two types (LOW and HIGH) of the device, which generate peak support moments at large and moderate flexion angles, respectively, were tested during lifts from knee and ankle height from a near and far horizontal position, with a load of 10?kg. Both types of the trunk exoskeleton tested here reduced the peak L5S1 compression force by around 5-10% for lifts from the FAR position from both KNEE and ANKLE height. Subjects did adjust their lifting style when wearing the device with a 17% reduced peak trunk angular velocity and 5 degrees increased lumbar flexion, especially during ANKLE height lifts. In conclusion, the exoskeleton had a minor and varying effect on the peak L5S1 compression force with only significant differences in the FAR lifts. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks
    Koopman, Axel S.
    Kingma, Idsart
    Faber, Gert S.
    de Looze, Michiel P.
    van Dieen, Jaap H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 83 : 97 - 103
  • [2] A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting
    Schmalz, Thomas
    Colienne, Anja
    Bywater, Emily
    Fritzsche, Lars
    Gaertner, Christian
    Bellmann, Malte
    Reimer, Samuel
    Ernst, Michael
    [J]. IISE TRANSACTIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 10 (01): : 7 - 20
  • [3] Lifting an unexpectedly heavy object:: the effects on low-back loading and balance loss
    van der Burg, JCE
    van Dieën, JH
    Toussaint, HM
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (07) : 469 - 477
  • [4] Objective and subjective evaluation of a passive low-back exoskeleton during simulated logistics tasks
    Mitterlehner, Lukas
    Li, Yasmin Xinyue
    Wolf, Matthias
    [J]. WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 4
  • [5] BIOMECHANICAL MODELING OF THE LOW-BACK DURING LOAD LIFTING
    CHAFFIN, DB
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1988, 31 (05) : 685 - 697
  • [6] BIOMECHANICAL MODELING OF THE LOW-BACK DURING LOAD LIFTING
    CHAFFIN, DB
    [J]. ERGONOMICS INTERNATIONAL 88, 1988, : 21 - 32
  • [7] Tensions of Low-Back Pain and Lifting; Bridging Clinical Low-Back Pain and Occupational Lifting Guidelines
    Reneman, Michiel F.
    Coenen, Pieter
    Kuijer, P. Paul F. M.
    van Dieen, Jaap H.
    Holtemann, Andreas
    Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso Nwamaka
    Parker, Romy
    Reezigt, Roland
    Stochkendahl, Mette J.
    Hoegh, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 34 (03) : 473 - 480
  • [8] Correction: Tensions of Low-Back Pain and Lifting; Bridging Clinical Low-Back Pain and Occupational Lifting Guidelines
    Reneman, Michiel F.
    Coenen, Pieter
    Kuijer, P. Paul F. M.
    van Dieen, Jaap H.
    Holtermann, Andreas
    Igwesi-Chidobe, Chinonso Nwamaka
    Parker, Romy
    Reezigt, Roland
    Stochkendahl, Mette J.
    Hoegh, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [9] Design and characterization of a multi-joint underactuated low-back exoskeleton for lifting tasks
    Lanotte, Francesco
    Baldoni, Andrea
    Dell'Agnello, Filippo
    Scalamogna, Antonio
    Mansi, Nunzio
    Grazi, Lorenzo
    Chen, Baojun
    Crea, Simona
    Vitiello, Nicola
    [J]. 2020 8TH IEEE RAS/EMBS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR BIOMEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIOMECHATRONICS (BIOROB), 2020, : 1146 - 1151
  • [10] Flexible sensor-based biomechanical evaluation of low-back exoskeleton use in lifting
    Yin, Wei
    Chen, Yinong
    Reddy, Curran
    Zheng, Liying
    Mehta, Ranjana K. K.
    Zhang, Xudong
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (02) : 182 - 193